Revision as of 07:49, 23 January 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Evidence submitted by Hipocrite: Add one← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:15, 23 January 2010 edit undoAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,255 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Checkuser resultsNext edit → | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
{{RFCU| B | E | |
{{RFCU| B | E | Checked }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC) </small> | ||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | <!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | ||
<!--## Codeletters are: | <!--## Codeletters are: | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
::{{moreinfo}} Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | ::{{moreinfo}} Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::: Absolutly. He's demonstrated a desire to help out his co-warriors about global warming. He's demonstrated an utter disregard for the encyclopedia, and given the immediate knowledge of terms like "WP:IAR" he's obviously someone's sock. The most frequent anti-AGW sockmaster is Scibaby, thus, this IP is probably Scibaby. ] (]) 21:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | ::: Absolutly. He's demonstrated a desire to help out his co-warriors about global warming. He's demonstrated an utter disregard for the encyclopedia, and given the immediate knowledge of terms like "WP:IAR" he's obviously someone's sock. The most frequent anti-AGW sockmaster is Scibaby, thus, this IP is probably Scibaby. ] (]) 21:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Rather obvious on behaviour, IMO. And {{confirmed-nc}} - the following accounts; | |||
:{{Checkuser|Lorast}} | |||
:{{Checkuser|THX788}} | |||
:{{Checkuser|LLstor}} | |||
:{{Checkuser|Pingshow}} | |||
: - ] <sup>]</sup> 08:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 08:15, 23 January 2010
Scibaby
Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
Report date January 22 2010, 21:04 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- 142.58.94.90 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Lorast (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Hipocrite
As normal. Now engaging in vandalism to prop up his comrades in arms.
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
Added Lorast. Typical MoO, typical topics, typical language. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Almost certainly not Scibaby. Please decline checkuser. -Atmoz (talk) 21:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Who could it be, then? Hipocrite (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Any reason why this cannot be handled directly by AIV? Tim Song (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- The immediate vandalism could. However, SciBaby (or whichever of the anti-science sockmasters is running this ipsock) typically run hoardes of sleeper accounts. Discovering those is the real goal. Hipocrite (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Additional information needed Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, Spitfire 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Absolutly. He's demonstrated a desire to help out his co-warriors about global warming. He's demonstrated an utter disregard for the encyclopedia, and given the immediate knowledge of terms like "WP:IAR" he's obviously someone's sock. The most frequent anti-AGW sockmaster is Scibaby, thus, this IP is probably Scibaby. Hipocrite (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Additional information needed Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, Spitfire 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Rather obvious on behaviour, IMO. And Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es). - the following accounts;
- Lorast (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- THX788 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LLstor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pingshow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Category: