| Revision as of 19:04, 5 January 2006 editJmax- (talk | contribs)910 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:02, 5 January 2006 edit undoEusebeus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,667 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''DELETE''' per above ] | *'''DELETE''' per above ] | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Agreed, Incognito ] 19:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Agreed, Incognito ] 19:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 20:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:02, 5 January 2006
Photocasting
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=photocasting&btnG=Google+Search 500 google hits for a non-notable concept (um, uploading photos to a website anyone?) nn neolojizzum. Timecop 07:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This appears to be a neologism at the moment. The author needs to assert the concepts' notable status. Surely anthing that can be rendered digitally has the potential to be -cast? -- (aeropagitica) UK 07:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This foocasting rubbish has to stop! Non-notable. Incognito 07:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete User:Timecop seems to be on the warpath against this kind of thing; see his user page. Still, most of his nominations seem to be correct. Segv11 07:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - cast this non-notable advertising into /dev/null - Femmina 09:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Per above... --Depakote 11:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Femmina --Hosterweis 13:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- DELETE per above Tapir
- Delete. Agreed, Incognito Jmax- 19:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Eusebeus 20:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
