Revision as of 16:34, 31 January 2010 editSL93 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers78,701 edits →Evidence submitted by Joe Chill← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:16, 31 January 2010 edit undoSL93 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers78,701 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | New }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) </small> | {{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | New }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) </small> | ||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | |||
<!--## Codeletters are: | |||
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion | |||
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism | |||
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes | |||
D - 3RR with socks | |||
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks | |||
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> | |||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | |||
---- | |||
===== <big>Report date January 31 2010, 23:16 (UTC)</big>===== | |||
{{SPIcat}} | |||
<!-- Please do not add a header here --> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Suspected sockpuppets </span>====== | |||
* {{checkuser|1=P-B-M-L-254}} | |||
<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>====== | |||
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> | |||
P-B-M-L-254 one and only edit was on ] with the comment "What is ANI without some drama? Find a link to John254's latest member of the family to Pickbothmanlol's family. I will assure you that you will find a connection weather you like it or not." | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== | |||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | |||
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | New }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 23:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) </small> | |||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | <!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | ||
<!--## Codeletters are: | <!--## Codeletters are: |
Revision as of 23:16, 31 January 2010
John254
John254 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/John254/Archive.
Report date January 30, 2010 02:29(UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
かなコバ (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted
Identical editing pattern and username pattern. 70.17.170.37 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
Comments by other users
CheckUser requests
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
Report date January 31 2010, 16:05 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Andrew the Assasin (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Joe Chill
John254 had many sockpuppets and tried to give the false impression that he was a new user. The first edits of Andrew the Assasin were to create Template:SpiAfD, create Template:SpiAfD/doc, add a proposal on the village pump page for it, and tag User:Werner Heisenberg (a John254 sockpuppet) as a sock in this AfD. I wouldn't have started an SPI report if he didn't just register today.
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Quack. Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
I can't find significant purpose for this sockpuppet case. Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- The user is obviously a sockpuppet, having made a very bizarre first seven edits, and should be blocked as an obvious undeclared alternate account being used to evade scrutiny. I'm not convinced that this is a John254 sock specifically, but that scarcely matters. ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 16:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well I do belong to two sockmasters that are both fluent in policy and experience. Can you guess who? Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
is slightly odd as well! ╟─TreasuryTag►secretariat─╢ 16:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Andrew the Assasin blocked as a VOA so it's probably moot, although there may be some sleepers around. Rodhullandemu 16:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Report date January 31 2010, 23:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- P-B-M-L-254 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Joe Chill
P-B-M-L-254 one and only edit was on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#John254 strikes again? with the comment "What is ANI without some drama? Find a link to John254's latest member of the family to Pickbothmanlol's family. I will assure you that you will find a connection weather you like it or not."
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Joe Chill (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Categories: