| Revision as of 04:33, 2 February 2010 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:36, 2 February 2010 edit undo86.44.33.121 (talk)No edit summaryTag: repeating charactersNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *Null edit? The warning reads "do not undo other people's edits repeatedly", which is exactly what you've done. Don't heed the warning if you don't want. Won't hurt my feelings. ] (]) 04:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | *Null edit? The warning reads "do not undo other people's edits repeatedly", which is exactly what you've done. Don't heed the warning if you don't want. Won't hurt my feelings. ] (]) 04:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Here is your first revert: . Here is the second revert: . Neither of those are null edits. That is 2 reverts. Next revert would make 3.......3RR, get it yet? ] (]) 04:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | Here is your first revert: . Here is the second revert: . Neither of those are null edits. That is 2 reverts. Next revert would make 3.......3RR, get it yet? ] (]) 04:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :You're seriously a moron. ] (]) 04:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 2 February 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:TheJazzDalek. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Calling an editor a douch is not being "perfectly cool". It is a personal attack and the warning is appropriate. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- The warning is appropriate. If you'd like to take it to WP:WQA, I'll be more than happy to. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep telling yourself that. If that is the most constructive thing you have to say, I'll presume we're done with this conversation. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Young Buck, or you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- You've reverted the same material twice in a short period of time. The template isn't "noob hate". It is a reminder of the 3RR rule and a link to the policy so you can familiarize yourself with it. By giving you the warning BEFORE you violate the 3RR, I'm helping you avoid being blocked for edit-warring.Niteshift36 (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Null edit? The warning reads "do not undo other people's edits repeatedly", which is exactly what you've done. Don't heed the warning if you don't want. Won't hurt my feelings. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Here is your first revert: . Here is the second revert: . Neither of those are null edits. That is 2 reverts. Next revert would make 3.......3RR, get it yet? Niteshift36 (talk) 04:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're seriously a moron. 86.44.33.121 (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)