Revision as of 00:31, 12 February 2010 editKanguole (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers39,401 edits →Clarification← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:57, 12 February 2010 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits →Clarification: - replyNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Hi Kanguole, sorry for any confusion, but it's probably best to ignore anything that Per Honor et Gloria says. He was actually completely banned from editing in the topic area of medieval history for over a year, for POV-pushing and misrepresenting sources, especially at the Franco-Mongol alliance article. His ban has since expired, but he seems to be back, and it looks like a new ban may be necessary. :/ If you'd like more info, see ]. --]]] 18:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | Hi Kanguole, sorry for any confusion, but it's probably best to ignore anything that Per Honor et Gloria says. He was actually completely banned from editing in the topic area of medieval history for over a year, for POV-pushing and misrepresenting sources, especially at the Franco-Mongol alliance article. His ban has since expired, but he seems to be back, and it looks like a new ban may be necessary. :/ If you'd like more info, see ]. --]]] 18:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks. I saw some of this on the talk page. ] 00:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | :Thanks. I saw some of this on the talk page. ] 00:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: Okay, just wanted to check. I've also contacted PHG's mentor, AngusMclellan, who is joining me in asking PHG to steer clear of the article for awhile. In the meantime, I did want to apologize to you, and hope we haven't scared you away! All GA reviewer comments are welcome. :) --]]] 00:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:57, 12 February 2010
Welcome to Kanguole's talk page.
|
Clarification
Hi Kanguole, sorry for any confusion, but it's probably best to ignore anything that Per Honor et Gloria says. He was actually completely banned from editing in the topic area of medieval history for over a year, for POV-pushing and misrepresenting sources, especially at the Franco-Mongol alliance article. His ban has since expired, but he seems to be back, and it looks like a new ban may be necessary. :/ If you'd like more info, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Franco-Mongol alliance. --Elonka 18:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I saw some of this on the talk page. Kanguole 00:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, just wanted to check. I've also contacted PHG's mentor, AngusMclellan, who is joining me in asking PHG to steer clear of the article for awhile. In the meantime, I did want to apologize to you, and hope we haven't scared you away! All GA reviewer comments are welcome. :) --Elonka 00:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)