Misplaced Pages

User talk:Laurel Lodged: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:17, 22 February 2010 editRashersTierney (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,046 edits Thurles: the lead is not a place for very specific detail, just an overall synopsis really← Previous edit Revision as of 00:33, 22 February 2010 edit undoRashersTierney (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,046 edits Thurles: not very collegiateNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
::: OK But what about '''3.3 Opening paragraph:The first paragraph of the introductory text needs to unambiguously define the topic for the reader'''? In an article devoted to a geographic entity, surely an unambiguous, strict, verifiable, hierarchical definition is pre-eminant? ] (]) 00:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC) ::: OK But what about '''3.3 Opening paragraph:The first paragraph of the introductory text needs to unambiguously define the topic for the reader'''? In an article devoted to a geographic entity, surely an unambiguous, strict, verifiable, hierarchical definition is pre-eminant? ] (]) 00:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
::::The article is about much more than 'geography' strictly defined. Its as much about history, politics, sport, commerce, personalities etc. Have a look at Irish (and other) towns of equivalent size to get a gist of what is usually located at the lead. Don't expect perfect consistency, but ideally there should be an overall compatibility. ] (]) 00:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC) ::::The article is about much more than 'geography' strictly defined. Its as much about history, politics, sport, commerce, personalities etc. Have a look at Irish (and other) towns of equivalent size to get a gist of what is usually located at the lead. Don't expect perfect consistency, but ideally there should be an overall compatibility. ] (]) 00:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::In light of , I guess I've been wasting my time here. ] (]) 00:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


== February 2010 == == February 2010 ==

Revision as of 00:33, 22 February 2010

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Laurel Lodged, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Thanks, TTGL | Talk to me! 22:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


Ok. Thanks TTGL. Are you like my handler or mentor now?Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Generally speaking there are no special 'buddies', but most eds. will be happy to help new Wikipedians out if you contact them on their Talk Pages. Welcome aboard and happy editing. RashersTierney (talk) 23:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

New articles

Hi Laural! You said "I am also interested in putting up pages that are not on Misplaced Pages, but are of local significance." What kind of articles do you have in mind? I'd be delighted to help if they are within my expertise. Fergananim (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking of starting some pages on the baronies of Ireland. Tipperary is as good a place to start as any. Perhaps showing how the baronies may have had their origins in older Gaelic chiefdoms (or may just have been Norman creations). Does this interest you? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Thurles

Not implying that your eds. can't be incorporated somewhere in article, but not at lead. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Why not the lead? The lead already sets out a geographical hierarchy (country, county, town). The addition of barony merely completes the picture without violating the strict hierarchy (country, county, barony, town). Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
See Misplaced Pages:Lead section#Relative emphasis. RashersTierney (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
OK But what about 3.3 Opening paragraph:The first paragraph of the introductory text needs to unambiguously define the topic for the reader? In an article devoted to a geographic entity, surely an unambiguous, strict, verifiable, hierarchical definition is pre-eminant? Laurel Lodged (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
The article is about much more than 'geography' strictly defined. Its as much about history, politics, sport, commerce, personalities etc. Have a look at Irish (and other) towns of equivalent size to get a gist of what is usually located at the lead. Don't expect perfect consistency, but ideally there should be an overall compatibility. RashersTierney (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
In light of your revert at the lead, I guess I've been wasting my time here. RashersTierney (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)