| Revision as of 15:15, 5 March 2010 view sourceAmorymeltzer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators63,405 edits →Herostratus / Viridae: Motions 1 and 2 passed← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:06, 7 March 2010 view source SirFozzie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,150 edits →Motions: Posted motionNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| {{Shortcut|WP:A/R/M}} | {{Shortcut|WP:A/R/M}} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| ==Trusilver's unblock of Brews ohare== | |||
| '''The unblock of ] by ] was done without the explicit written consent of the Arbitration Committee, or a full and active community discussion as required. The Arbitration Committee explicitly rejects Trusilver's defense of ] in this situation. However, since the block has since expired, it will not be reapplied. For misuse of his administrator tools, ]'s administrator rights are revoked. He may regain them through a new ] or through a request to the Arbitration Committee.''' | |||
| ===Discussion=== | |||
| (please make your own section to discuss) | |||
| ===Arbitrator voting and discussion=== | |||
| ;Support | |||
| # I would like to note that while we give administrators a good amount of leeway on how they enforce ArbCom's remedies at AE and elsewhere, they are still required to discuss their actions as needed, and if consensus is against the action taken, gracefully consent to having the action overturned. But that consensus needs to be that of the community, not that of highly charged partisans on a user's talk page. ] (]) 20:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ;Oppose | |||
| ;Abstain | |||
Revision as of 20:06, 7 March 2010
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motions| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Trusilver's unblock of Brews ohare | 7 March 2010 |
Motions
 | Shortcuts
This page can be used by arbitrators to propose motions not related to any existing case or request. Motions are archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Motions. Only arbitrators may propose or vote on motions on this page. You may visit WP:ARC or WP:ARCA for potential alternatives. Make a motion (Arbitrators only) You can make comments in the sections called "community discussion" or in some cases only in your own section. Arbitrators or clerks may summarily remove or refactor any comment. |
Trusilver's unblock of Brews ohare
The unblock of User:Brews ohare by User:Trusilver was done without the explicit written consent of the Arbitration Committee, or a full and active community discussion as required. The Arbitration Committee explicitly rejects Trusilver's defense of WP:IAR in this situation. However, since the block has since expired, it will not be reapplied. For misuse of his administrator tools, User:Trusilver's administrator rights are revoked. He may regain them through a new WP:RfA or through a request to the Arbitration Committee.
Discussion
(please make your own section to discuss)
Arbitrator voting and discussion
- Support
- I would like to note that while we give administrators a good amount of leeway on how they enforce ArbCom's remedies at AE and elsewhere, they are still required to discuss their actions as needed, and if consensus is against the action taken, gracefully consent to having the action overturned. But that consensus needs to be that of the community, not that of highly charged partisans on a user's talk page. SirFozzie (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Abstain