| Revision as of 03:07, 7 March 2010 editHistory Sleuth (talk | contribs)2,493 edits →Warning - March 2010← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:17, 7 March 2010 edit undoDawnOfTheBlood (talk | contribs)172 edits →Unauthorized warning: Kindly follow wiki policies. Lets work together.Next edit → | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| :Are you an Admin? Unless you are an admin you are not authorizsd to issue warning like this. Secondly , you are plain wrong that I am tryhing to glorify the person. I was the one who wrote about the controversies first. You are obviosly involved in the gaming the rules to push your POV. You are trying to denigrate this person by supperssing anything favorable about him in the article. Please stop this. I understand your passion about the whole issue but do not try to game the rules here. You should not have delted the edits before engaging other editors in discussion but you obviously deleted the edits first and then made a token attempt at discussioin. Please do not game the rules and refrain from issuing such warnings in future. If you are that worried about this article, I suggest you request a third editor's participation or submit this article for dispute resolution. Thanks.--] (]) 03:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | :Are you an Admin? Unless you are an admin you are not authorizsd to issue warning like this. Secondly , you are plain wrong that I am tryhing to glorify the person. I was the one who wrote about the controversies first. You are obviosly involved in the gaming the rules to push your POV. You are trying to denigrate this person by supperssing anything favorable about him in the article. Please stop this. I understand your passion about the whole issue but do not try to game the rules here. You should not have delted the edits before engaging other editors in discussion but you obviously deleted the edits first and then made a token attempt at discussioin. Please do not game the rules and refrain from issuing such warnings in future. If you are that worried about this article, I suggest you request a third editor's participation or submit this article for dispute resolution. Thanks.--] (]) 03:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Respected editor, Kindly make yourself knowledgeable about[REDACTED] policies. This warning was in-compliance with existing wiki policies. Also, per ] and ], any unsourced information from this article can immediately be deleted. Again, I am willing to work with you to improve any articles. Kind Regards. --] (]) 03:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sumedh Singh Saini== | ==Sumedh Singh Saini== | ||
Revision as of 03:17, 7 March 2010
Hi
You appear new to Misplaced Pages, but have a pretty sound knowledge base on Hinduism. While I value your critiques, would you mind if I periodically refer to for consensus regarding other issues to with intricacies of opinion on Hinduism topics? I have many lol.--~Raja~ (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Sure, Raja Sahab. Sorry I had to leave our conversation yesterday due to some errands that I had to run. I will discuss more with you on the discussion page as I get time ...cheers--History Sleuth (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 Archives |
|---|
Speedy deletion nomination of Oct 2009
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Airplaneman 03:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Pictures
Hi History Sleuth - sorry for not getting back to you regarding the images. As you saw I asked Skier Dude for clarification after he deleted one of the pics, and I relaise you came across his reply to me. It seems his explanation was sufficient, and looks like you know what to do, but feel free to buzz me again if there are any more issues. AJCham 21:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Saini suryavanshi
Hi,
If you believe that Saini suryavanshi should be deleted, rather than replacing the page with a note, you need to nominate it as a redirect for deletion. WP:RFD provides the steps to do this. If you have difficulty doing it, feel free to ask me for help. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Sadhu Singh Hamdard
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sadhu Singh Hamdard, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php?title=Sadhu_Singh_Hamdard. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Don't delete it yet. Let me rework the language. This content is in public domain. Thanks.--History Sleuth (talk) 00:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Lord Krishna
Hey, If Lord Krishna was a Saini, then why everywhere is written that he was born in YADAV's family? --59.177.100.151 (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Read Maharaja Shurasena article. Thanks--History Sleuth (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Pritam Saini
You are correct; I will remove it. However the article still needs cleanup; please remove the non-English references and add more references. Cheers, laurap414 (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Harpreet Singh Sidhu
Do you have any details regarding this person ? Jon Ascton (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Unauthorized warning
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits and violation of Misplaced Pages policies.
KINDLY JOIN THE DISCUSSION IN THE DISCUSSION PAGE. Stop this vandalism. Your sources do not say what you are ADDING. Wrong information can not stay
The rollbacks, such as edit 1, edit 2 is a violation of Misplaced Pages policies. The rollback feature can only be used to fix Misplaced Pages:Vandalism and Misplaced Pages:Patent nonsense. Your edits are going to be reverted to save this article from your vandalism now.
Nothing has been given undue weight. I have read the article; every single sentence has a valid reference. Hence it does not violate wp:BLP. You have been given a chance to come up with reliable reference which could support your text, but you could not add them. You CAN NOT just add ANY REFERENCES alongwith TOTALLY UNRELATED TEXT. I again encourage you to address the issues in the discussion page before adding any controversial statements.
You can not glorify a person without reliable references. If the person has such a bad reputation/history in the newspapers/reliable sources then it is not a fault of the editors who are opposing you. You must provide a source to add text, otherwise it will not stay.--DawnOfTheBlood (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Are you an Admin? Unless you are an admin you are not authorizsd to issue warning like this. Secondly , you are plain wrong that I am tryhing to glorify the person. I was the one who wrote about the controversies first. You are obviosly involved in the gaming the rules to push your POV. You are trying to denigrate this person by supperssing anything favorable about him in the article. Please stop this. I understand your passion about the whole issue but do not try to game the rules here. You should not have delted the edits before engaging other editors in discussion but you obviously deleted the edits first and then made a token attempt at discussioin. Please do not game the rules and refrain from issuing such warnings in future. If you are that worried about this article, I suggest you request a third editor's participation or submit this article for dispute resolution. Thanks.--History Sleuth (talk) 03:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Respected editor, Kindly make yourself knowledgeable about[REDACTED] policies. This warning was in-compliance with existing wiki policies. Also, per wp:BLP and Misplaced Pages:Libel, any unsourced information from this article can immediately be deleted. Again, I am willing to work with you to improve any articles. Kind Regards. --DawnOfTheBlood (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Sumedh Singh Saini
I request you to join the discussion on Talk:Sumedh Singh Saini and address the issues with your text. It is not healty practice to add text without supporting references. Please answer all my points one by one so that you could understand the issues. Kind Regards. --DawnOfTheBlood (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)