Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ms2ger: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:06, 8 March 2010 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits WP:ACTOR and non-standard Filmographies (redux): new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:08, 8 March 2010 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 editsm -nitNext edit →
Line 49: Line 49:
Hi, sorry I reverted some of your cleanup. You can blame IE, but it's not formatting well in my browser . Also I've got lots of such templates, and making more and have no interest in avoiding the BR approach to formatting which seems fine to me. ] (]) 10:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Hi, sorry I reverted some of your cleanup. You can blame IE, but it's not formatting well in my browser . Also I've got lots of such templates, and making more and have no interest in avoiding the BR approach to formatting which seems fine to me. ] (]) 10:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
:Ugh, that's even weirder than I'd expect from IE. Thanks for the note. —] (]) 11:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC) :Ugh, that's even weirder than I'd expect from IE. Thanks for the note. —] (]) 11:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

== ] and non-standard Filmographies (redux) ==


== ] and non-standard Filmographies (redux) == == ] and non-standard Filmographies (redux) ==

Revision as of 00:08, 8 March 2010

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ms2ger, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Sincerely, Ryan 10:20, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

TUSC token d08b916a2a1fe098b36c985b89cc1707

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Cite id

Hiya, could you fill me in on the background to that edit? I could not see any references to cite id on the citation/core talk page. I was not aware there was a problem with cite id; it has the advantage over the present formatting that the reference jumped to is highlighted in blue. --JN466 20:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

The problem is with the cite element: it isn't appropriate for the purposes it was used for. There was discussion to move away from it at Template talk:Citation/core. I agree that my first version wasn't optimal, though. I have changed the article to use <span class="citation"> instead, which keeps the highlighting intact. Nice work on the article, by the way. —Ms2ger (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks very much for sorting it out; I'll use that method in future. User:ChrisO wrote the article; I helped him organise the references.
Btw, Google Chrome does not handle jumps to the 2nd (or 3rd ...) column of references correctly. It places the blue highlight around the correct ref, but scrolls too far down. In Mozilla it is perfect: the reference highlighted in blue is the top line on the screen, even if it is in the right-hand ref column. --JN466 11:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I would've sworn you were ChrisO, for some reason. (I have to say it was one of the better formatted references section I've seen, though.)
I thought we didn't give WebKit columns anymore for precisely that reason, seems like I was wrong. Do you know if a bug was filed on WebKit already? —Ms2ger (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:WikiProject Arts

Template:WikiProject Arts, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Template:WikiProject Arts and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:WikiProject Arts during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kleinzach 08:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, I agree that it should be deleted. —Ms2ger (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you...

for this! I'm useless in template space and so I rarely venture into it, but I thought we should have a new template for a new decade! Cheers, HJMitchell You rang? 18:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. —Ms2ger (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

cleanup

Hi, sorry I reverted some of your cleanup. You can blame IE, but it's not formatting well in my browser . Also I've got lots of such templates, and making more and have no interest in avoiding the BR approach to formatting which seems fine to me. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 10:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Ugh, that's even weirder than I'd expect from IE. Thanks for the note. —Ms2ger (talk) 11:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:ACTOR and non-standard Filmographies (redux)

Hi. I just read the long thread at:

I've stumbled into this issue during the last few days, having worked on maybe 20 filmographies attempting to clean-up poor markup and styling.

I think the time has come to sort the issue of non-standard styling in the name of a wikiproject. The whole initiative originating there reeks of article ownership, wikiprojects as "governing" bodies, and impeding site accessibility in the name of meretricious appearance.

I think the appropriate outcome is filmographies either implemented as bog-standard wikitables, or a suite of templates/css that allow central control of the styling (i.e. to site-wide conventions).

The current point of discussion is at:

I hope to see you there.

Cheers, Jack Merridew 00:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)