User talk:Matthead: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:17, 17 March 2010 editNuclearWarfare (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits →March 2010: procedural decline← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:25, 17 March 2010 edit undoMatthead (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits →March 2010 Next edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:

	{{unblock reviewed\|1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.\|decline=Procedural decline: A reviewing administrator is not allowed to unblock unilaterally an administrator blocked to enforce an ArbCom decision. Please see ] for instructions on how to properly appeal this block. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.\|decline=Procedural decline: A reviewing administrator is not allowed to unblock unilaterally an administrator blocked to enforce an ArbCom decision. Please see ] for instructions on how to properly appeal this block. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)}}

			Uh, what? Special rules? A blocking admin just has to claim he enforces an Arbcom decision, and the block must not be questioned by another admin? Beats me. -- ] ]  23:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 17 March 2010

Archives

User talk:Matthead/Archive2006
User talk:Matthead/Archive2007
User talk:Matthead/Archive2008
User talk:Matthead/Archive2009

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Did you know & Signpost


24 December 2024
News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform" Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting? Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

24 December 2024

News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform"

Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything

Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject

In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case

From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?

Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality

Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies

Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols

Traffic report: Was a long and dark December

Single page

Jahangir Preferring a Sufi Shaikh to Kings

... that a painting (pictured) by the artist Bichitr shows an Indian emperor preferring a Sufi saint over the king of England and the Ottoman sultan?
... that a study of people who reported experiences of alien abduction found that many exhibited characteristics consistent with fantasy-prone personality?
... that the My Chemical Romance song "Cancer" was written in eight minutes?
... that Ambo Sooloh pledged allegiance to the British government on behalf of all Malays in Singapore?
... that a pavilion next to New York City's Ted Weiss Federal Building was canceled due to the discovery of human remains?
... that Pocatello mayor Les Purce was the first African-American political officeholder in Idaho?
... that the Chapline columbine is generally considered a distinct species, except in Texas, where it is considered a variety of the golden columbine?
... that a Portsmouth building was Grade II-listed because Eric Rimmington painted a mural inside it?
... that the Glucoboy was advertised as the "first medical device to interface with a Nintendo Game Boy"?

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Matthead! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 8 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Klaus Ludwig - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jochen Neerpasch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Max Welti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Herbert Linge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Davy Jones (racing driver) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ellen Lohr - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marc Duez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Justin Bell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Klaus Fischer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Giovanni Galli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Wolfgang von Trips

Hello, I thought I should let you know that I've requested a page move from Wolfgang Graf Berghe von Trips to Wolfgang von Trips, as you made the original move a few years ago.--Midgrid (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Medal table

Ich denke am vielversprechendsten wäre es vorerst nur die FRG/GER Fusion zu unterstützenden. Wenn ich mir die zurückliegenden Versuche anschaue hier einen Konsens zu erlangen, denke ich, dass hier die Logik am meisten überzeugt. Wäre schön wenn Du die Variante unterstützen könntest. Es sieht so aus als wenn hier langer Atem und konsequentes Argumentieren notwendig wäre. Cheers KarlMathiessen (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Sandstein#Your attention needed

I'd appreciate your comment on this. Sandstein 09:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks first. Sandstein 22:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

This is a block per WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions for your nationalist WP:BATTLEground conduct and harrassment at as discussed at . Please stop this. Sandstein 23:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matthead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: A reviewing administrator is not allowed to unblock unilaterally an administrator blocked to enforce an ArbCom decision. Please see WP:AEBLOCK for instructions on how to properly appeal this block. NW (Talk) 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Uh, what? Special rules? A blocking admin just has to claim he enforces an Arbcom decision, and the block must not be questioned by another admin? Beats me. -- Matthead Discuß 23:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:17, 17 March 2010 editNuclearWarfare (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits →March 2010: procedural decline← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:25, 17 March 2010 edit undoMatthead (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits →March 2010 Next edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:

	{{unblock reviewed\|1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.\|decline=Procedural decline: A reviewing administrator is not allowed to unblock unilaterally an administrator blocked to enforce an ArbCom decision. Please see ] for instructions on how to properly appeal this block. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.\|decline=Procedural decline: A reviewing administrator is not allowed to unblock unilaterally an administrator blocked to enforce an ArbCom decision. Please see ] for instructions on how to properly appeal this block. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 23:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)}}

			Uh, what? Special rules? A blocking admin just has to claim he enforces an Arbcom decision, and the block must not be questioned by another admin? Beats me. -- ] ]  23:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)