Misplaced Pages

Mark Tushnet: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:53, 24 March 2010 edit208.46.240.2 (talk) Biography← Previous edit Revision as of 15:04, 29 April 2010 edit undoPonyo (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators171,558 edits Remove unsourced and trivial quote. Removed unsourced info/original research and red linked individuals with no independent notability. Update tag to 'BLP sources' as there is a source included.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BLP unsourced|date=May 2007}} {{BLP sources|date=May 2007}}
{{Original research|date=September 2007}} {{Original research|date=September 2007}}
'''Mark V. Tushnet''' (born 1945) is currently the ] ] of ] at ]. A prominent scholar of ] and legal history, he is the author of many books and articles. '''Mark V. Tushnet''' (born 1945) is currently the ] ] of ] at ]. A prominent scholar of ] and legal history, he is the author of many books and articles.


==Biography== ==Career==
Tushnet received his ] from ]. He later received an ] in history from ] and his ] from the ]. While serving as a ] to ] ], Tushnet is rumored to have authored a memo that dramatically influenced the opinion in '']''.{{Fact|date=November 2008}} Tushnet received his ] from ]. He later received an ] in history from ] and his ] from the ]. Tushnnet has been a faculty member at the ], and he taught for many years at the ].


One of the more controversial figures in constitutional theory, he is identified with the ] movement and once stated in an article that, were he asked to decide actual cases as a judge, he would seek to reach results that would "advance the cause of socialism"<ref>"The Dilemmas of Liberal Constitutionalism," 42 '']'' 411, 424 (1981).</ref>. Tushnet is a main proponent of the idea that ] should be strongly limited and that the Constitution should be returned "to the people." Tushnet is, with Professor ] of Georgetown, the co-author of a ] entitled "Comparative Constitutional Law" (], 2d ed. 2006).
Tushnnet has been a faculty member at the ], and he taught for many years at the ].


==Work and ideas== ==Personal life==
Tushnet is married to Elizabeth Alexander, who directs the National Prison Project of the ]. Their daughter Rebecca is a professor of law at ], and their daughter Eve is a freelance conservative opinion writer and journalist.

One of the more controversial figures in constitutional theory, he is identified with the ] movement and once stated in an article that, were he asked to decide actual cases as a judge, he would seek to reach results that would "advance the cause of socialism"<ref>"The Dilemmas of Liberal Constitutionalism," 42 '']'' 411, 424 (1981).</ref>.

Tushnet is a main proponent of the idea that ] should be strongly limited and that the Constitution should be returned "to the people."

Tushnet has occasionally described himself as a "quasi-]", but has not explained precisely what that means. He is an advocate of "popular constitutionalism," the idea that structural political constraints, not the ], are sufficient to protect the rights enumerated in the Constitution.

Professor Tushnet has also established himself as a leading scholar in the emerging field of ]. He is, with Professor ] of Georgetown, the co-author of a ] entitled "Comparative Constitutional Law" (], 2d ed. 2006).

==Family==
Tushnet is married to Elizabeth Alexander, who directs the National Prison Project of the ]. Their daughter ] is a professor of law at ], and their daughter ] is a freelance conservative opinion writer and journalist.


==Books== ==Books==
Line 48: Line 38:
# ''Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle over Guns (Inalienable Rights)''. # ''Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle over Guns (Inalienable Rights)''.
#{{cite book | last =Tushnet | first =Mark | authorlink =Mark Tushnet | title =A Court Divided: The ] Court and the Future of Constitutional Law, |publisher =W.W. Norton Co. |date =2005 | location =New York | pages = | url = | doi = | id = | isbn =9780393327571; ISBN 978-0-393-05868-0; ISBN 0393058689.}} #{{cite book | last =Tushnet | first =Mark | authorlink =Mark Tushnet | title =A Court Divided: The ] Court and the Future of Constitutional Law, |publisher =W.W. Norton Co. |date =2005 | location =New York | pages = | url = | doi = | id = | isbn =9780393327571; ISBN 978-0-393-05868-0; ISBN 0393058689.}}

==Quotes==
* "This what you call a 'deep-doo-doo' problem -- if you think the Senate will flip a coin to impeach a judge, then you're already in deep doo-doo." (He has also referred to this as the "you're screwed" problem.)


==Footnotes== ==Footnotes==

Revision as of 15:04, 29 April 2010

This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous.
Find sources: "Mark Tushnet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (September 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Mark V. Tushnet (born 1945) is currently the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. A prominent scholar of constitutional law and legal history, he is the author of many books and articles.

Career

Tushnet received his B.A. from Harvard University. He later received an M.A. in history from Yale University and his J.D. from the Yale Law School. Tushnnet has been a faculty member at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and he taught for many years at the Georgetown University Law Center.

One of the more controversial figures in constitutional theory, he is identified with the Critical Legal Studies movement and once stated in an article that, were he asked to decide actual cases as a judge, he would seek to reach results that would "advance the cause of socialism". Tushnet is a main proponent of the idea that judicial review should be strongly limited and that the Constitution should be returned "to the people." Tushnet is, with Professor Vicki Jackson of Georgetown, the co-author of a casebook entitled "Comparative Constitutional Law" (Foundation Press, 2d ed. 2006).

Personal life

Tushnet is married to Elizabeth Alexander, who directs the National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union. Their daughter Rebecca is a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center, and their daughter Eve is a freelance conservative opinion writer and journalist.

Books

  1. The New Constitutional Order (Prininceton U. Press 2003).
  2. The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Peter Cane & Mark V. Tushnet eds., Oxford U. Press 2003).
  3. Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law (Vicki C. Jackson & Mark Tushnet eds., Praeger 2002).
  4. And L. Michael Seidman et al., Constitutional Law (Little, Brown and Co. 4th ed. 2001).
  5. Et al., Federal Courts in the 21st Century: Cases and Materials (LexisNexis 2001).
  6. Marshall, Thurgood; Tushnet, Mark V. (Editor); and Kennedy, Randall (Forward by). (2001). Thurgood Marshall: His Speeches, Writings, Arguments, Opinions and Reminiscences. Chicago: Chicago Review Press, Incorporated -- Lawrence Hill Books. ISBN 9781556523861. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. Making Constitutional Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1961-1991 (1997).
  8. Brown v. Board of Education: The Battle for Integration (1995).
  9. The Warren Court in Historical and Political Perspective (Mark V. Tushnet ed., 1993).
  10. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1956-1961 (1994).
  11. The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925-1950 (1987).
  12. The American Law of Slavery, 1810-1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest (1981).
  13. And L. Michael Seidman et al., Constitutional Law (Little, Brown and Co. Supp. 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 2d ed. 1991, Supp. 1992, 1995, 1996, 3d ed. 1996, Supp. 1998, 4th ed. 2001).
  14. And Vicki C. Jackson, Comparative Constitutional Law (Foundation Press 1999).
  15. Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts (Princeton University Press 1999), excerpted in Great Cases in Constitutional Law (Robert P. George ed., Princeton University Press, 2000) (reprinting chapter 1 in substance). Symposium of Commentaries on this book: 34 University of Richmond Law Review 359-566 (2000).
  16. And L. Michael Seidman et al., Teacher's Manual to The First Amendment (Aspen Law & Business 1999).
  17. And Francisco Forrest Martin, The Rights International Companion to Constitutional Law: An International Human Rights Law Supplement (Kluwer Law International 1999).
  18. And L. Michael Seidman, Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues (Oxford University Press 1996).
  19. Constitutional Issues: The Death Penalty (Facts On File, Inc. 1994).
  20. Constitutional Law (International Library of Essays in Law & Legal Theory) (Mark V. Tushnet, ed., New York University Press 1992).
  21. Comparative Constitutional Federalism: Europe and America (Mark V. Tushnet ed., Greenwood Press 1990).
  22. Central America and the Law: The Constitution, Civil Liberties, and the Courts (South End Press 1988).
  23. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law (Harvard University Press 1988).
  24. I Dissent: Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases, Malaysia: Beacon Press, pp. 256, (2008) ISBN 978-080700036-6.</ref>
  25. Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle over Guns (Inalienable Rights).
  26. Tushnet, Mark (2005). A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law,. New York: W.W. Norton Co. ISBN 9780393327571; ISBN 978-0-393-05868-0; ISBN 0393058689.. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)

Footnotes

  1. "The Dilemmas of Liberal Constitutionalism," 42 Ohio State Law Journal 411, 424 (1981).

External links

Categories: