| Revision as of 00:46, 3 April 2010 editGADFLY46 (talk | contribs)320 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:05, 3 April 2010 edit undoTonyTheTiger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers401,000 edits →Talk page cleanup: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| King of wikipedia ? Anyone is allowed ot enter text in the DISCUSSION part of an entry! ] 00:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | King of wikipedia ? Anyone is allowed ot enter text in the DISCUSSION part of an entry! ] 00:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Talk page cleanup == | |||
| Thanks.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 01:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:05, 3 April 2010
| This is Balph Eubank's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Speedy deletion declined: Brock Cemetery
Hello Burpelson AFB. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Brock Cemetery, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has context: it has the location and two people buried in the Cemetery. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ok thanks Steve, that makes sense. I've AFDed it instead. Burpelson AFB (talk) 23:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Your input is requested
As you have recently edited Andy Martin (American politician), I am writing to request your input at the article talk page, sections Vexed and disputed are the ones which outline the current issue. Many thanks in advance for your time. KillerChihuahuaAdvice 21:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying me... I had a look and I think I'm going to leave that one alone. Maybe it's worth posting a notice at the village pump or something. Burpelson AFB (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm following the standard practice of soliciting input from the recent, or regular, contributors of an article. If insufficient feedback is obtained, an Rfc is probably the next step, but it appears that won't be necessary. Thanks for taking a look - and of course if you change your mind your input is welcome! KillerChihuahuaAdvice 14:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
RE: Please Be Careful
My apologies. Thanks for letting me know though. ataricom (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I like your username.
Slightly obscure references to awesome movies are A-OK in my book. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to see if I can get some quarters out of this Coca-Cola machine so I can make a phone call. Hellbus (talk) 03:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Quarters? - Quarters? Hellbus you are too young. When Dr S was made phone calls - and bottles of Coke from a vending machine only cost a dime. The Coke machine wouldn't even take a quarter (though the pay phone would AND it would give you 15 cents back). Sorry to intrude on your talk page "B AFB". I like your user name too and I wanted to leave a little old fogie info for you both. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 01:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
who do you think you are
King of wikipedia ? Anyone is allowed ot enter text in the DISCUSSION part of an entry! gadfly46 00:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk page cleanup
Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)