| Revision as of 11:16, 5 May 2010 editLindsayH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers32,040 edits →Tone: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 5 May 2010 edit undoFlavius Constantine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,302 edits ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == IWU again == | |||
| Hello again, Flavius Constantine. Without trying to be pushy, i'd like to suggest that you mosey on over to the ] page or, more specifically, the talk page, and participate in the discussion there; Inquietudeofcharacter has made some suggestions that i think bear thinking about, and some of them, at least, should probably be taken. But, as the lottery likes to point out, you have to be in it.... Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 19:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I've made numerous changes to the article, including several that weren't mentioned. Thanks for your input. ] (]) 04:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Tone == | |||
| Hi Flavius. I realise that this isn't a fully private place, but what i want to say may not be appropriate for the current conversation ], which is completely public. You may want to watch your tone as you are in discussion with ]. Several things you have said smack of ownership of the article, such as what you will or will not allow, that you will make any necessary edits, and what he may or may not do. I know you know it, but WP is a collaborative project; why not take a look again at ] to see how it fits together. I would also suggest that you might be coming close to commenting on the editor, not the edits, which, again as you know, is not the best way. Please don't take this message as criticism, but as a guide to help us forward, or a word to the wise. Cheers, ''']'''<sup>]</sup> 11:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | |||