Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ephery: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:58, 7 June 2010 editEphery (talk | contribs)2,524 edits Draft stuff← Previous edit Revision as of 13:03, 7 June 2010 edit undoEphery (talk | contribs)2,524 edits Draft stuffNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
===Progress on ] continues to be possible === ===Progress on ] continues to be possible ===
True progress on ] and related articles seems to require a different sort of editing procedure. In this section, I want to describe three concrete examples of such progress and explain why I think that a good result of this arbitration would be to require that this method be used going forward. True progress on ] and related articles seems to require a different sort of editing procedure. In this section, I want to describe three concrete examples of such progress and explain why I think that a good result of this arbitration would be to require that this method be used going forward.

===Guidance is needed on applying ] to ===
I suspect that many complaints about my behavior will center around recent disputes about material related to Arthur Jensen, a living person. The original debate is ]

Revision as of 13:03, 7 June 2010

For Barnstars, see: User:David.Kane#Awards.
Archiving icon
Archives

1


Draft stuff

I am going to draft some R&I related material here.

Progress on Race and Intelligence has been made as a result of mediation

I started on Misplaced Pages in June 2006 and first became involved with race and intelligence related controversies in

Progress on Race and Intelligence continues to be possible

True progress on Race and Intelligence and related articles seems to require a different sort of editing procedure. In this section, I want to describe three concrete examples of such progress and explain why I think that a good result of this arbitration would be to require that this method be used going forward.

Guidance is needed on applying WP:BLP to

I suspect that many complaints about my behavior will center around recent disputes about material related to Arthur Jensen, a living person. The original debate is Misplaced Pages:BLP/N#Arthur_Jensen:_Do_serious_accusations_from_potentially_biases_sources_require_a_higher_standard_of_proof.3F here