Misplaced Pages

User talk:R12056: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:14, 8 June 2010 editFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits Welcome← Previous edit Revision as of 17:46, 8 June 2010 edit undoFæ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers83,148 edits →Feedback: new sectionNext edit →
Line 58: Line 58:
|} |}
|} |}

== Feedback ==

Hi, as per your request I've had a quick look over your recent contributions but not in great detail as some seem a little complex to understand. You seem to be taking on a lot of behind the scenes action, if you are relatively recent this is unusual as most editors would need a more solid set of contributions to articles before doing this gnomic stuff. It looks more as if this is not your first account, if so, it would be nice to have some context.

Some of your edits seemed odd:
*adding a {{tl|Spamusername}} to an old indef blocked account
:This seems a bit of a waste of time to me, there are an awful lot of blocked accounts where the talk pages were never tidied up. Unless they present a confusing hazard, leaving them blank or at least minimal seems sufficient. It's okay to sort them out but probably a better investment of time to advise active vandals on how to behave.
* adding a helpme tag to Jimbo Wales's sub-page
:I think you meant to get help for the contributor to that page, this is a bit confusing as the template really ought to be added to the talk page of the user who needs help rather than amid a discussion.
*I puzzled as to your corrections to ], it looks like another editor's scratchpad, so I'm not sure if you are doing valid gnomic tidying or monkeying with someone else's notes.

Anyway, that's some quick feedback. In summary you are dug deep in the machine, nothing wrong with that but probably an idea to come up for air and make some straightforward improvements to article space content. Cheers ] (]) 17:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:46, 8 June 2010

Hello, R12056, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Misplaced Pages.

Happy editing! Fæ (talk) 17:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Feedback

Hi, as per your request I've had a quick look over your recent contributions but not in great detail as some seem a little complex to understand. You seem to be taking on a lot of behind the scenes action, if you are relatively recent this is unusual as most editors would need a more solid set of contributions to articles before doing this gnomic stuff. It looks more as if this is not your first account, if so, it would be nice to have some context.

Some of your edits seemed odd:

This seems a bit of a waste of time to me, there are an awful lot of blocked accounts where the talk pages were never tidied up. Unless they present a confusing hazard, leaving them blank or at least minimal seems sufficient. It's okay to sort them out but probably a better investment of time to advise active vandals on how to behave.
  • diff adding a helpme tag to Jimbo Wales's sub-page
I think you meant to get help for the contributor to that page, this is a bit confusing as the template really ought to be added to the talk page of the user who needs help rather than amid a discussion.
  • I puzzled as to your corrections to User:Excirial/Blocknote, it looks like another editor's scratchpad, so I'm not sure if you are doing valid gnomic tidying or monkeying with someone else's notes.

Anyway, that's some quick feedback. In summary you are dug deep in the machine, nothing wrong with that but probably an idea to come up for air and make some straightforward improvements to article space content. Cheers Fæ (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)