| Revision as of 04:48, 10 June 2010 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,485 editsm Reverted edits by Snottywong (talk) to last version by Gene93k← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:51, 10 June 2010 edit undoJafeluv (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,410 edits revert; see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Snottywong/userboxes/ARSbackfireNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] that has written a non-notable book. The award he was nominated for (Indie Excellence Award) doesn't seem to be notable either. '''Erpert''' <small>]</small> 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC) | ] that has written a non-notable book. The award he was nominated for (Indie Excellence Award) doesn't seem to be notable either. '''Erpert''' <small>]</small> 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| {{ARSnote}} | |||
| Erpert, I'm new at using Misplaced Pages and was quite stunned at your comment to remove my article; especially since I wasn't even done with the editing process. Gone are the days where we had to wait 50 years for a "notable" author. After reading Nine Weeks, I was compelled to share the news about this up and coming author who happened to be a finalist in the Indie Excellence Award - a national competition that saw more submissions this year than previous years. Moreover, after reading carefully at the ] the following points are made about articles such as the one I've written...''The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."''The point about being "worthy of notice" and interesting enought to be recorded" stuck out to me - this article is significant and interesting to the fans out there. So, rather than delete my article, I ask that you reconsider it as an opportunity to share some insight about an up and coming author. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Erpert, I'm new at using Misplaced Pages and was quite stunned at your comment to remove my article; especially since I wasn't even done with the editing process. Gone are the days where we had to wait 50 years for a "notable" author. After reading Nine Weeks, I was compelled to share the news about this up and coming author who happened to be a finalist in the Indie Excellence Award - a national competition that saw more submissions this year than previous years. Moreover, after reading carefully at the ] the following points are made about articles such as the one I've written...''The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."''The point about being "worthy of notice" and interesting enought to be recorded" stuck out to me - this article is significant and interesting to the fans out there. So, rather than delete my article, I ask that you reconsider it as an opportunity to share some insight about an up and coming author. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
| *I think you might be a little confused with how Misplaced Pages works, Esjackson. That ''you'' think Mr. Stowell is an up-and-coming author is all well and good, but he isn't notable ''yet.'' Subjects have to be notable ''before'' they have a Misplaced Pages article, not after. By the way, ]. '''Erpert''' <small>]</small> 06:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *I think you might be a little confused with how Misplaced Pages works, Esjackson. That ''you'' think Mr. Stowell is an up-and-coming author is all well and good, but he isn't notable ''yet.'' Subjects have to be notable ''before'' they have a Misplaced Pages article, not after. By the way, ]. '''Erpert''' <small>]</small> 06:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 17:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 17:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' this ]. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:51, 10 June 2010
Rich Stowell
- Rich Stowell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author that has written a non-notable book. The award he was nominated for (Indie Excellence Award) doesn't seem to be notable either. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Erpert, I'm new at using Misplaced Pages and was quite stunned at your comment to remove my article; especially since I wasn't even done with the editing process. Gone are the days where we had to wait 50 years for a "notable" author. After reading Nine Weeks, I was compelled to share the news about this up and coming author who happened to be a finalist in the Indie Excellence Award - a national competition that saw more submissions this year than previous years. Moreover, after reading carefully at the Misplaced Pages:BIO the following points are made about articles such as the one I've written...The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."The point about being "worthy of notice" and interesting enought to be recorded" stuck out to me - this article is significant and interesting to the fans out there. So, rather than delete my article, I ask that you reconsider it as an opportunity to share some insight about an up and coming author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esjackson (talk • contribs) 20:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: The award is not major. Even the creator said that the author is non-notable: "up and coming". Joe Chill (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Publish Misplaced Pages is one of the greatest, if not best source on the web for information. I've been using it for years and I finally found an author worth listing - who I couldn't find - I had to search several places for background information. This article is needed, especially for fans, followers, etc. to learn more about their idols without having to search the entire web. All the information I've written is verifiable, again, which meets the qualification criteria for Misplaced Pages. The article should maintain the status quo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esjackson (talk • contribs) 22:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Joined the army. Self-published a book. Get the next one published by a publisher, and try again. Peridon (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Verifiable is important. So is notability. Lots of things can be verified but aren't notable. Peridon (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think you might be a little confused with how Misplaced Pages works, Esjackson. That you think Mr. Stowell is an up-and-coming author is all well and good, but he isn't notable yet. Subjects have to be notable before they have a Misplaced Pages article, not after. By the way, even though you created the article, it isn't yours. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete this resume. Fails WP:AUTHOR. SnottyWong talk 23:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)