| Revision as of 15:20, 27 January 2006 editCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:46, 28 January 2006 edit undoCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| 26th January 2006 | |||
| ''Statement of WIKIness 1'' | ''Statement of WIKIness 1'' | ||
| Line 9: | Line 5: | ||
| I will never ] a page that has been edited in ]. In true life there is no point in reversion, if someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. I will not revert first time ] on a userpage either. Sometimes Vandalism can afford some small ], sometimes such creativity can be harnessed. I believe a ] can be poked fun at and we can be entertained. Either way editing, NOT reverting, is always the best way! I bet you can find something worthy in every edit..look hard! Otherwise those trying to ]...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert ]...only one ] being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial. | I will never ] a page that has been edited in ]. In true life there is no point in reversion, if someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. I will not revert first time ] on a userpage either. Sometimes Vandalism can afford some small ], sometimes such creativity can be harnessed. I believe a ] can be poked fun at and we can be entertained. Either way editing, NOT reverting, is always the best way! I bet you can find something worthy in every edit..look hard! Otherwise those trying to ]...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert ]...only one ] being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial. | ||
| ''Statement of WIKIness 2'' | |||
| '''NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT''' | |||
| Encyclopaedic ]! It's increasing. More and more ] pages contain rivalries, especially over history. I'm not naming names but I'm sorry..there are some areas in history that are accepted as fact..it doesn't matter whatever way you revise history into a nationalist mould, the ] forces didn't win at ], The ] didn't ultimitely triumph and ] doesn't rule the world!! | |||
| I think it is really egotistical to dismiss somebody's ] because it is based on a different national school of thought than your own, equally it is not productive to edit an artcle brutally to your way of thinking. A compromise should be reached to provide the best of both views. You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace. Again the thought is edit Wisely! | |||
| ''There is more WIKIness coming soon...i just have to wait for more things to p me off, It's good then that this is all!'' | |||
| == FREE SPEECH-- == | |||
| I would like to say, to me my userpage will always be free, and not politically correct. If it offends anyone, then it is not meant to be a bureaucratic pièce. However, remember that people died for free speech, and i strongly believe in using it to its fullest to express myself before I am stripped of it again. | |||
| '''I keep coming accross alot of pointless ] rant in reverts in discussions, or edits which I have to adjust, as per my no revert policy! i keep coming across, am i going mad? You can't have a go at someone about their contributions because they happen to be born in a ] boundary you disagree with, their point is as ] as yours!''' | |||
| Welcome to my user page. I am very much in favour of a free ] within the public domain and one that can be accessed and added to by everyone with few ]s on ] of speech. When i see someone in a discussion page getting angry over something as it disagrees with their ] (POV) I am a little perturbed that they do not understand the point of wikipedia as a tool for ], and therfore by necessity ]; nothing more. But it also pleases me that something stirs inside of them, it means not only that they have read the article, but also the discussions and will contribute and may lead to broader thinking. This can only be a good thing. | |||
| I have a ] in ], specialising in ] ] and ] history |
I have a ] in ], specialising in ] ] and ] history over a broad period. When i get stuck in to articles fully, this might actually show! | ||
| This week's Recommended pages: | |||
| '''People are driving me ]!!''' I go to a very well written ] and in the ]s page there are numerous complaints concerning the article, however the complainers have only complained; not made any effort to ], hold a ] on changes or are simply bemoaning ]ic history! Most of all many people seem to forget that an an ecyclopaedia is a tool for learning and can hold articles as varied as "the ]" to "]", but there is a difference between ]about something and being taught how something's done. People need to ]...make those edits, don't be destructive or thoughtless and ask...but use ] and ]! | |||
| I loathe ] and also articles that, through lack of reading, or over editing, become a ramshackle of nothingness....instead of debating whether or not they should ]!! | |||
| {{Babel-8|en|ang-2|cy-2|de-3|es-3|fr-4|la-2|ot}} {{user AmE-0}} {{user blz}} {{user du-1}} {{user en-L-1}} {{user ubx-5}} {{user programming-0}} {{user prepositions:yes}} {{user_ellipses}} {{user -genderneutral}} {{user British English}} {{user Adult}} {{user ancestry English}} {{user childless}} {{user never left Northern Hemisphere}} {{user United Kingdom}} {{user Proud English}} {{user date}} {{user GMT}} {{user degree/BA}} {{user mental health perd}} {{user Epileptic}} {{user smoker}} {{user zodiac:Taurus}} {{user Chinese zodiac:Dog}} {{user death-restrict}} {{user EFF}} {{user not censored}} {{user freedom}} {{user Conservation Movement}} {{user green energy}} {{user Public Transit}} {{User Recycling}} {{user gun control}} {{user pacifist4}} {{user politics}} {{user moderate}} {{user liberty}} {{user Monarchist}} {{user PC-0}} {{user Antiracist hitler}} {{user Pro-choice}} {{userbox|blue|yellow|Derbyshire|This user is from ], "The ]"}} {{user theist2}} {{user staticinfinite}} {{user theistic evolution2}} {{user illegal-immigration-1}} {{user 13col}} {{user independent Western Sahara}} {{user independent Taiwan}} {{user independent Tibet}} {{user Palestine}} {{user bad EU}} {{user NoEuro}} {{user independent Basque Country}} {{user independent Montenegro}} {{user Devolution}} {{user independent England2}} {{user Wales included}} {{user Sex Education}} {{user queer}} {{user Rome}} {{user yellow}} {{user LimeWire}} {{user winxp}} {{user cvg}} {{user PC}} {{user wikipedia}} {{user oops}} {{user wikipedia:No personal attacks}} {{user copyright}} {{user RV War}} {{user screw}} {{user pd}} | {{Babel-8|en|ang-2|cy-2|de-3|es-3|fr-4|la-2|ot}} {{user AmE-0}} {{user blz}} {{user du-1}} {{user en-L-1}} {{user ubx-5}} {{user programming-0}} {{user prepositions:yes}} {{user_ellipses}} {{user -genderneutral}} {{user British English}} {{user Adult}} {{user ancestry English}} {{user childless}} {{user never left Northern Hemisphere}} {{user United Kingdom}} {{user Proud English}} {{user date}} {{user GMT}} {{user degree/BA}} {{user mental health perd}} {{user Epileptic}} {{user smoker}} {{user zodiac:Taurus}} {{user Chinese zodiac:Dog}} {{user death-restrict}} {{user EFF}} {{user not censored}} {{user freedom}} {{user Conservation Movement}} {{user green energy}} {{user Public Transit}} {{User Recycling}} {{user gun control}} {{user pacifist4}} {{user politics}} {{user moderate}} {{user liberty}} {{user Monarchist}} {{user PC-0}} {{user Antiracist hitler}} {{user Pro-choice}} {{userbox|blue|yellow|Derbyshire|This user is from ], "The ]"}} {{user theist2}} {{user staticinfinite}} {{user theistic evolution2}} {{user illegal-immigration-1}} {{user 13col}} {{user independent Western Sahara}} {{user independent Taiwan}} {{user independent Tibet}} {{user Palestine}} {{user bad EU}} {{user NoEuro}} {{user independent Basque Country}} {{user independent Montenegro}} {{user Devolution}} {{user independent England2}} {{user Wales included}} {{user Sex Education}} {{user queer}} {{user Rome}} {{user yellow}} {{user LimeWire}} {{user winxp}} {{user cvg}} {{user PC}} {{user wikipedia}} {{user oops}} {{user wikipedia:No personal attacks}} {{user copyright}} {{user RV War}} {{user screw}} {{user pd}} | ||
Revision as of 17:46, 28 January 2006
Statement of WIKIness 1
REVERSION IS NOT THE FIRST OPTION I will never revert a page that has been edited in good faith. In true life there is no point in reversion, if someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. I will not revert first time vandalism on a userpage either. Sometimes Vandalism can afford some small fun, sometimes such creativity can be harnessed. I believe a vandal can be poked fun at and we can be entertained. Either way editing, NOT reverting, is always the best way! I bet you can find something worthy in every edit..look hard! Otherwise those trying to Be Bold...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert war...only one opinion being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial.
Statement of WIKIness 2
NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT Encyclopaedic nationalism! It's increasing. More and more discussion pages contain rivalries, especially over history. I'm not naming names but I'm sorry..there are some areas in history that are accepted as fact..it doesn't matter whatever way you revise history into a nationalist mould, the French forces didn't win at Agincourt, The British Empire didn't ultimitely triumph and Andorra doesn't rule the world!! I think it is really egotistical to dismiss somebody's opinion because it is based on a different national school of thought than your own, equally it is not productive to edit an artcle brutally to your way of thinking. A compromise should be reached to provide the best of both views. You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace. Again the thought is edit Wisely!
There is more WIKIness coming soon...i just have to wait for more things to p me off, It's good then that this is all!
FREE SPEECH--
I would like to say, to me my userpage will always be free, and not politically correct. If it offends anyone, then it is not meant to be a bureaucratic pièce. However, remember that people died for free speech, and i strongly believe in using it to its fullest to express myself before I am stripped of it again.
Welcome to my user page. I am very much in favour of a free encyclopaedia within the public domain and one that can be accessed and added to by everyone with few limitations on freedom of speech. When i see someone in a discussion page getting angry over something as it disagrees with their point of view (POV) I am a little perturbed that they do not understand the point of wikipedia as a tool for learning, and therfore by necessity free speech; nothing more. But it also pleases me that something stirs inside of them, it means not only that they have read the article, but also the discussions and will contribute and may lead to broader thinking. This can only be a good thing.
I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal history over a broad period. When i get stuck in to articles fully, this might actually show!
This week's Recommended pages:
| en- US-0 | This user does not understand American English and doesn't bloody well want to. |
| blz | This user understands blazon. |
| LE-1 | This user's been known to screw up the occasional sentence and make the occasional typo, but is otherwise pretty accurate with regards to English. |
| prog-0 | This user does not know how to program. |
| …in. | Ending a sentence with a preposition is something that this user is okay with. |
| … | This user is addicted to ellipses and has been known to use them indiscriminately... |
| man- kind | Regarding gender, this user prefers the vernacular, not what is politically correct. |
| UK | This user uses British English. |
| 18+ | This user is an adult. |
 | This user is of English ancestry. |
Template:User childless Template:User never left Northern Hemisphere
 | This user lives in the United Kingdom. |
| This user is proud to be English. |
 | Today is 13 January 2025 |
| BA | This user has a Bachelor of Arts degree. |
Template:User mental health perd Template:User Epileptic Template:User smoker Template:User zodiac:Taurus Template:User Chinese zodiac:Dog Template:User death-restrict Template:User EFF Template:User not censored Template:User freedom Template:User Conservation Movement Template:User green energy Template:User Public Transit Template:User Recycling
 | This user supports testing and licensing all firearm owners the same as motorists. |
Template:User pacifist4 Template:User politics Template:User moderate Template:User liberty
 | This user is a monarchist. |
| PC-0 | This user is politically incorrect, and will use common sense and speak plainly rather than tripping all over himself trying to be inoffensive. |
Template:User Antiracist hitler Template:User Pro-choice
| Derbyshire | This user is from Derbyshire, "The Peak District" |
Template:User theist2 Template:User staticinfinite Template:User theistic evolution2 Template:User illegal-immigration-1 Template:User 13col Template:User independent Western Sahara Template:User independent Taiwan Template:User independent Tibet
 | This user comes from Palestine. |
Template:User bad EU Template:User NoEuro Template:User independent Basque Country Template:User independent Montenegro Template:User Devolution Template:User independent England2
 | This user supports the inclusion of a Welsh symbol in the Union Jack. |  |
Template:User Sex Education Template:User queer Template:User Rome Template:User yellow Template:User LimeWire Template:User winxp Template:User cvg Template:User PC
 | This user is a Wikipedian. |
 | This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know. |
 | This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks. |
 | This user finds edit/revert wars disruptive. |
 | This user reserves the right to completely screw up his own edits. |
 | Content contributed by this user is released into the public domain. |
My Contributions, ETC>>>
]
Categories: