| Revision as of 22:32, 30 January 2006 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 editsm Rv. It's not just one word, it's the entire pro-Moroccan POV that you're pushing. See Talk, of course.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:39, 30 January 2006 edit undoDaryou (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,102 edits Rv, will you explain your complaints in the talk? or will you refuse any discussion and continue your blind reverting?Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Morocco, to the north of the Spanish Sahara, had long claimed that the territory was historically an integral part of Morocco, and should not be granted ]. Mauritania to the south argued similarly that the territory was in fact Mauritanian. Since ], a ] ] led by the ] had challenged Spanish control with increasing success, and in October 1975 Spain had quietly begun negotiations for a handover of power with leaders of the rebel movement] | Morocco, to the north of the Spanish Sahara, had long claimed that the territory was historically an integral part of Morocco, and should not be granted ]. Mauritania to the south argued similarly that the territory was in fact Mauritanian. Since ], a ] ] led by the ] had challenged Spanish control with increasing success, and in October 1975 Spain had quietly begun negotiations for a handover of power with leaders of the rebel movement] | ||
| Morocco intended to vindicate its claims by demanding a verdict from the ] (ICJ). The ] that there were historical legal ties of allegiance between ] and the ], as well as ties including some rights relating to the land between Mauritania and these same tribes. However the ICJ stated also that there was no ties of territorial sovereignty between the territory and Morocco or Mauritania at the time of Spanish |
Morocco intended to vindicate its claims by demanding a verdict from the ] (ICJ). The ] that there were historical legal ties of allegiance between ] and the ], as well as ties including some rights relating to the land between Mauritania and these same tribes. However the ICJ stated also that there was no ties of territorial sovereignty between the territory and Morocco or Mauritania at the time of Spanish colonization. By then the court stated that those legal ties don't affect the principle of self-determination of the peoples of the Territory. A ] had concluded on October 15 that Sahrawi support for independence was "overwhelming". However, the reference to previous Moroccan-Sahrawi ties of allegiance was presented by ] ] as a vindication of his position, and within hours of the ICJ verdict's release, he announced the initiative of the "green march" to Spanish Sahara, to "reunite it with the Motherland". | ||
| However, the reference to previous Moroccan-Sahrawi ties of allegiance was presented by ] ] as a vindication of his position, with no mention of the court's further ruling on self-determination. Within hours of the ICJ verdict's release, he announced the organizing of a "green march" to Spanish Sahara, to "reunite it with the Motherland". | |||
| == The Green March == | == The Green March == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 12: | ||
| ==The Madrid Accords== | ==The Madrid Accords== | ||
| As a result, Spain agreed to enter direct bilateral negotiations with Morocco, bringing in also ], who had made similar demands. This resulted in the November 14 ], a secret pact which divided Spanish Sahara between Mauritania and Morocco, in return for a 35% concession in the ] mines of ], and Spanish ]ing rights offshore neutral evidence needed. Both nations then formally annexed the parts they had been alloted in the Accords, and |
As a result, Spain agreed to enter direct bilateral negotiations with Morocco, bringing in also ], who had made similar demands. This resulted in the November 14 ], a secret pact which divided Spanish Sahara between Mauritania and Morocco, in return for a 35% concession in the ] mines of ], and Spanish ]ing rights offshore neutral evidence needed. Both nations then formally annexed the parts they had been alloted in the Accords, and annexed the territory. Morocco claimed the northern part, i.e. ] and minor parts of ], while Mauritania proceeded to annex the southern third of the country under the name ]. The Polisario, with ]n backing, refused the Madrid Accords, and demanded that the ICJ's opinion on Sahrawi ] be respected: and so began a long, still unsettled war. | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 30 January 2006
- This article is about the historical event. For the aerobatic team see: Marche Verte.
The Green March was a peaceful mass demonstration in November 1975, coordinated by the Moroccan government, to force Spain to hand over the disputed colony of Spanish Sahara (now Western Sahara) to Morocco.
Background
Morocco, to the north of the Spanish Sahara, had long claimed that the territory was historically an integral part of Morocco, and should not be granted independence. Mauritania to the south argued similarly that the territory was in fact Mauritanian. Since 1973, a Sahrawi guerrilla war led by the Polisario Front had challenged Spanish control with increasing success, and in October 1975 Spain had quietly begun negotiations for a handover of power with leaders of the rebel movement]
Morocco intended to vindicate its claims by demanding a verdict from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ stated that there were historical legal ties of allegiance between Sahrawi tribes and the Sultan of Morocco, as well as ties including some rights relating to the land between Mauritania and these same tribes. However the ICJ stated also that there was no ties of territorial sovereignty between the territory and Morocco or Mauritania at the time of Spanish colonization. By then the court stated that those legal ties don't affect the principle of self-determination of the peoples of the Territory. A UN visiting mission had concluded on October 15 that Sahrawi support for independence was "overwhelming". However, the reference to previous Moroccan-Sahrawi ties of allegiance was presented by King Hassan II as a vindication of his position, and within hours of the ICJ verdict's release, he announced the initiative of the "green march" to Spanish Sahara, to "reunite it with the Motherland".
The Green March
In preparation for the march, Moroccan Army forces crossed the border to engage the Polisario on October 31 neutral evidence needed. As preparations were underway for the march, a well-publicized event of enormous proportions. On November 6, 1975, approximately 350,000 unarmed Moroccans converged on the city of Tarfaya in southern Morocco and waited for a signal from King Hassan II of Morocco to cross into Western Sahara. They brandished Moroccan flags, banners calling for the return of the Southern Provinces, photographs of the King and the Qur'an. The color green for the march's name was intended as a symbol of Islam. As the marchers reached the border - even though the majority never crossed it - Spanish troops were ordered not to fire, and the demonstration could be completed without bloodshed.
The Madrid Accords
As a result, Spain agreed to enter direct bilateral negotiations with Morocco, bringing in also Mauritania, who had made similar demands. This resulted in the November 14 Madrid Accords, a secret pact which divided Spanish Sahara between Mauritania and Morocco, in return for a 35% concession in the phosphate mines of Bu Craa, and Spanish fishing rights offshore neutral evidence needed. Both nations then formally annexed the parts they had been alloted in the Accords, and annexed the territory. Morocco claimed the northern part, i.e. Saguia el-Hamra and minor parts of Río de Oro, while Mauritania proceeded to annex the southern third of the country under the name Tiris al-Gharbiyya. The Polisario, with Algerian backing, refused the Madrid Accords, and demanded that the ICJ's opinion on Sahrawi self-determination be respected: and so began a long, still unsettled war.
See also
- Western Sahara
- History of Western Sahara
- International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara