Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Donski: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:59, 25 July 2010 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,198 edits Aleksandar Donski: d← Previous edit Revision as of 11:27, 25 July 2010 edit undoArmbrust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers326,145 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Aleksandar Donski}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Donski}}|2=AfD statistics}}) :{{la|Aleksandar Donski}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Donski}}|2=AfD statistics}})
Line 6: Line 6:
This person has written some minor books on history. None of them have been peer reviewed or taken seriously by mainstream historians, or used as references. None of them, to the best of my knowledge, have been used as references in Misplaced Pages and would certainly be rejected as reliable sources. The article seems more like self-promotion and there has been debate to that effect in the talk page. The article has been tagged for some time. ] (]) 18:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC) This person has written some minor books on history. None of them have been peer reviewed or taken seriously by mainstream historians, or used as references. None of them, to the best of my knowledge, have been used as references in Misplaced Pages and would certainly be rejected as reliable sources. The article seems more like self-promotion and there has been debate to that effect in the talk page. The article has been tagged for some time. ] (]) 18:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
*Note: This was originally appended to the bottom of ]. All I did was fix the nomination formatting. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC) *Note: This was originally appended to the bottom of ]. All I did was fix the nomination formatting. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
{{AfD-vote|Delete}} Probably eligible simply because it's an unreferenced BLP anyways. <b>~ <font size="2.5" face="Arial" font color="#66699"><i>]</i></b></font><font size="2.5" face="Lucida Sans" color="#CC6600">]</font><font size="3" color="#663300"><big> · </big></font><font size="2" face="Lucida Sans" color="#003300">]</font> {{Middot}} 05:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC) *{{AfD-vote|Delete}} Probably eligible simply because it's an unreferenced BLP anyways. <b>~ <font size="2.5" face="Arial" font color="#66699"><i>]</i></b></font><font size="2.5" face="Lucida Sans" color="#CC6600">]</font><font size="3" color="#663300"><big> · </big></font><font size="2" face="Lucida Sans" color="#003300">]</font> {{Middot}} 05:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
*'''delete''' – this author is somewhat notable in the sense of being notorious in the field of certain nationalist polemics, and it would certainly be no problem finding coverage of him by his opponents (such as the guy who wrote ]), but since most of these will in turn also fail to constitute reliable sources, and we have next to nothing sourced on him as a person (biographical detail etc.), it's probably better to let the article go. Note that the article has in the past fluctuated between being promotional and being an attack page and there had to be admin intervention after OTRS complaints . ] ] 06:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC) *'''delete''' – this author is somewhat notable in the sense of being notorious in the field of certain nationalist polemics, and it would certainly be no problem finding coverage of him by his opponents (such as the guy who wrote ]), but since most of these will in turn also fail to constitute reliable sources, and we have next to nothing sourced on him as a person (biographical detail etc.), it's probably better to let the article go. Note that the article has in the past fluctuated between being promotional and being an attack page and there had to be admin intervention after OTRS complaints . ] ] 06:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:27, 25 July 2010

Aleksandar Donski

Aleksandar Donski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person has written some minor books on history. None of them have been peer reviewed or taken seriously by mainstream historians, or used as references. None of them, to the best of my knowledge, have been used as references in Misplaced Pages and would certainly be rejected as reliable sources. The article seems more like self-promotion and there has been debate to that effect in the talk page. The article has been tagged for some time. Politis (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This was originally appended to the bottom of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/James Baar. All I did was fix the nomination formatting. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Template:AfD-vote Probably eligible simply because it's an unreferenced BLP anyways. ~ QwerpQwertus · Contact Me  · 05:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
  • delete – this author is somewhat notable in the sense of being notorious in the field of certain nationalist polemics, and it would certainly be no problem finding coverage of him by his opponents (such as the guy who wrote The Ten Lies of Macedonism), but since most of these will in turn also fail to constitute reliable sources, and we have next to nothing sourced on him as a person (biographical detail etc.), it's probably better to let the article go. Note that the article has in the past fluctuated between being promotional and being an attack page and there had to be admin intervention after OTRS complaints . Fut.Perf. 06:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Categories: