| Revision as of 08:51, 28 July 2010 editNorcalal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,092 edits →Removal of the preeminence of SF is an WPOV issue.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 29 July 2010 edit undoTJRC (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,531 edits →San Francisco Bay Area: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Your obvious bias of San Jose over San Francisco, the preeminent city of the SF Bay Area, can continue, but the edits and removal of facts with citations will not stand. The bias is so strong that you would list San Pablo Bay before San Francisco Bay and misrepresent the facts to all readers. Continue this process and an administrator will be asked to intervene. The entire world sees San Francisco as a preeminent world city light years beyond the status of San Jose. Does that mean San Jose does not supersede in some areas? Not at all. But to rewrite sections, removing SF by "slight of word" and demanding preeminence for San Jose where it is not the case is pure bias. ] (]) 09:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC) | Your obvious bias of San Jose over San Francisco, the preeminent city of the SF Bay Area, can continue, but the edits and removal of facts with citations will not stand. The bias is so strong that you would list San Pablo Bay before San Francisco Bay and misrepresent the facts to all readers. Continue this process and an administrator will be asked to intervene. The entire world sees San Francisco as a preeminent world city light years beyond the status of San Jose. Does that mean San Jose does not supersede in some areas? Not at all. But to rewrite sections, removing SF by "slight of word" and demanding preeminence for San Jose where it is not the case is pure bias. ] (]) 09:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : Again? Really? ] (]) 08:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | : Again? Really? ] (]) 08:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == San Francisco Bay Area == | |||
| Please join the conversation at ] before continuing to edit-war in the article. Please also familiarize yourself with the policies at ] and ]. Many of your edits have merit, but you seem to be getting carried away. ] (]) 00:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 29 July 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages.
Please note that the Bay Area is called San Francisco Bay Area after the San Francisco Bay; The main reason I reverted your edit was that not only did you add again Los Altos twice, but you broke several links, these changes make it hard for users to navigate the site. Please be aware of the impact of your changes before commiting them, feel free to use the show preview button. Also be aware that many of your changes would be considered controversial, and you should discuss them in the discussion page before doing anything. Thanks for paying attention, I'm not trying to discourage you from making changes to the articles, just to be more careful.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert your name and timestamp, use (~~~~) (four tildes), or, to insert just your name, type (~~~) (three tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Misplaced Pages:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you may want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Good luck, have fun, and be bold! (just don't overdo it) --JVittes 07:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Removal of the preeminence of SF is an WPOV issue.
Your obvious bias of San Jose over San Francisco, the preeminent city of the SF Bay Area, can continue, but the edits and removal of facts with citations will not stand. The bias is so strong that you would list San Pablo Bay before San Francisco Bay and misrepresent the facts to all readers. Continue this process and an administrator will be asked to intervene. The entire world sees San Francisco as a preeminent world city light years beyond the status of San Jose. Does that mean San Jose does not supersede in some areas? Not at all. But to rewrite sections, removing SF by "slight of word" and demanding preeminence for San Jose where it is not the case is pure bias. Norcalal (talk) 09:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Again? Really? Norcalal (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
San Francisco Bay Area
Please join the conversation at Talk:San Francisco Bay Area#MSA name, CSA name, etc. before continuing to edit-war in the article. Please also familiarize yourself with the policies at WP:3RR and WP:BRD. Many of your edits have merit, but you seem to be getting carried away. TJRC (talk) 00:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)