| Revision as of 13:40, 13 August 2010 editInniverse (talk | contribs)1,802 edits response to Buckshot06← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:13, 13 August 2010 edit undoBuckshot06 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users132,966 edits respNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *3. Would you also like to explain why you are creating extra work for everybody against clear consensus? I am now going to have to send the 105th MP Co to a deletion debate, despite the existence of both ] and ] which have twice demonstrated that the community does not deem these units/articles notable. ] ] 07:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | *3. Would you also like to explain why you are creating extra work for everybody against clear consensus? I am now going to have to send the 105th MP Co to a deletion debate, despite the existence of both ] and ] which have twice demonstrated that the community does not deem these units/articles notable. ] ] 07:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : I have posted my response on your talk page. Do not post messages to my talk page, especially ones that falsely accuse me of harassing admins. ] (]) 13:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | : I have posted my response on your talk page. Do not post messages to my talk page, especially ones that falsely accuse me of harassing admins. ] (]) 13:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : It is your every right to clearly designate where you wish conversation to take place. However, if you do not do so, perhaps by saying 'I am watching talkpages upon which I post messages' you must expect some users to post on your talkpage in order to engage with you. Communication through talkpages is just about a non-negotiable part of the wikipedia project. I would sincerely despite our rather rocky start advise you to add a banner saying 'I watch others' talkpages' or whatever particular method you follow. I'm not sure how this would address others' need on occasion to get in touch for the first time. ] ] 21:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:13, 13 August 2010
This is my talk page and I do not want to use it as a forum for public discussions. I will not reply to messages left on this talk page. If you leave a message here it will be removed. If I choose to reply, I will reply on your talk page. Inniverse (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 | Inniverse is currently feeling discouraged about Misplaced Pages and is taking an off-and-on wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. |
Transportation battalions
- 1. Apologies - I did indeed relist the 27th Transp. Centre against guidelines.
- 2. Stop harassing administrators against clear consensus!! Buckshot06 (talk) 07:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- 3. Would you also like to explain why you are creating extra work for everybody against clear consensus? I am now going to have to send the 105th MP Co to a deletion debate, despite the existence of both Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/54th Military Police Company (United States) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/118th Military Police Company (United States) which have twice demonstrated that the community does not deem these units/articles notable. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- I have posted my response on your talk page. Do not post messages to my talk page, especially ones that falsely accuse me of harassing admins. Inniverse (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is your every right to clearly designate where you wish conversation to take place. However, if you do not do so, perhaps by saying 'I am watching talkpages upon which I post messages' you must expect some users to post on your talkpage in order to engage with you. Communication through talkpages is just about a non-negotiable part of the wikipedia project. I would sincerely despite our rather rocky start advise you to add a banner saying 'I watch others' talkpages' or whatever particular method you follow. I'm not sure how this would address others' need on occasion to get in touch for the first time. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)