Misplaced Pages

Talk:Virginia Bottomley: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:16, 9 September 2010 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,539 edits →Source for date of marriage?: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:21, 9 September 2010 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,539 edits →Source for date of marriage?: - actually nevermind, I found a source quickly enoughNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


In bio's of politicians is it normal to refer to them by their given names? It reads as though it was written by one of her friends or admirers (and probably was). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> In bio's of politicians is it normal to refer to them by their given names? It reads as though it was written by one of her friends or admirers (and probably was). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Source for date of marriage? ==

I removed some convoluted stuff about her age and her husband's age at marriage and when they met, for two reasons. First, it was convoluted and didn't seem to be making any relevant point. Second, none of the sources for this article confirm the date of the marriage. I left the date of the marriage for now, pending further clarification. About to search for it, if I have time.--] (]) 16:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:21, 9 September 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Peerage and Baronetage Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
More information:
/ 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

The anagram might not be the most important fact about her life, but it has been widely quoted and is one of the more interesting anagrams of celebrity names. Warofdreams 10:24, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

But she is not evil and not a bigot, so it has nothing to do with her. This one is already in the anagram page examples. --Audiovideo 14:39, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Style

In bio's of politicians is it normal to refer to them by their given names? It reads as though it was written by one of her friends or admirers (and probably was). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.40.225 (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Categories: