| Revision as of 22:42, 6 February 2006 editMoe Epsilon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,291 edits rvt vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2006 edit undoRhobite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,728 edits Accusations of vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| If he returns and causes more trouble, then he will accumulate harsher and harsher punishments. It's a cumulative thing- usually it's alloted in steps, although at any time if his attacks are severe enough an admin can skip a step and apply a more severe punishment. ] 05:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC) (Doom127) | If he returns and causes more trouble, then he will accumulate harsher and harsher punishments. It's a cumulative thing- usually it's alloted in steps, although at any time if his attacks are severe enough an admin can skip a step and apply a more severe punishment. ] 05:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC) (Doom127) | ||
| == Accusations of vandalism == | |||
| Please don't accuse other users of vandalizing articles if they are trying to make good-faith contributions to the encyclopedia. ]'s contributions to ] are coherent. You may think there is a better, more neutral way to phrase the section, but that doesn't make his contributions vandalism. Please see ] for more information about what is and isn't vandalism. Thank you. ] 23:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2006
Anon 68.xx IP
I noticed that that the anon IP reverted one of your articles. I put it back to normal- this sitation sounds like a case of Wikistalking. If he does it again, let me know. Daniel Davis 04:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC) (Doom127)
Regarding the vandal
If he returns and causes more trouble, then he will accumulate harsher and harsher punishments. It's a cumulative thing- usually it's alloted in steps, although at any time if his attacks are severe enough an admin can skip a step and apply a more severe punishment. Daniel Davis 05:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC) (Doom127)
Accusations of vandalism
Please don't accuse other users of vandalizing articles if they are trying to make good-faith contributions to the encyclopedia. User:200.122.158.40's contributions to Free Republic are coherent. You may think there is a better, more neutral way to phrase the section, but that doesn't make his contributions vandalism. Please see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism for more information about what is and isn't vandalism. Thank you. Rhobite 23:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC)