| Revision as of 00:09, 7 October 2010 editEdward321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,434 edits →Rileah Vanderbilt← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:17, 7 October 2010 edit undoM.O.X (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors18,590 editsm →Rileah Vanderbilt: - comment - remove vote from single-purpose accountNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *The problem is that that is a BLP violation, a BLP needs reliable sources so that potentially challenged material can be backed up. If it doesn't have reliable sources that's not grounds for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. —<span style="font-family:Tahoma;">''']</span> • <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-variant:small-caps;">] • 11:17am •'''</span> 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''RETAIN''' It cites many of the same sources as any other BLP who happens to act. Look at Alan Tudyk, he's got many of the same sites as references. What's the problem? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Erafalko}} | |||
Revision as of 00:17, 7 October 2010
Rileah Vanderbilt
- Rileah Vanderbilt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that cites many unreliable sources such as IMDB, Official Star Wars Fan Film Challenge Web Site, Break.com, Action Flick Chick, MrDisgusting and ShockTillYouDrop.com. Google search cannot return reputable sources. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 7:16pm • 09:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not only are there no reliable sources, the roles are all trivial. Edward321 (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that that is a BLP violation, a BLP needs reliable sources so that potentially challenged material can be backed up. If it doesn't have reliable sources that's not grounds for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 11:17am • 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)