Revision as of 03:24, 30 October 2010 editTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers278,993 edits AfD nomination of Necrophilia in popular culture. using TW← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:24, 30 October 2010 edit undoTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers278,993 edits blank, long blocked userNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{indefblockeduser}} |
|
{{User:1ne/Title|jesus was an extraterrestrial}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
'''Welcome!''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ] 01:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thank you. ] 01:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hello == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages ''':)''' Looking forward to learning more of your ideas about the ] article. regards, ] ] 01:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
== AIDS Reappraisal == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've noticed you removed the Pseudoscience categorisation from ]. Do you mind explaining this on the ]? Thanks. ] 17:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Jang Young-sil source == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thanks for taking interest in this article. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it is the source that I have indicated below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Baek Sauk Gi is the author. The page number is 61. |
|
|
|
|
|
I already had a discussion with another ] and here it is (from my talk). |
|
|
|
|
|
"I got your message & replied to it. Just in case you missed it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Woong-Jin-Wee-In-Jun-Gi #11 Jang Young Sil by Baek Sauk Gi. Copyright 1987 Woongjin Publishing Co., Ltd. Pg. 61. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is my bibliography. It says in Korean that although China was the first one to print, a Korean named Chae Yoon Eyee (eui) invented the first iron movable type printing. |
|
|
|
|
|
And then... Jang Young Sil (장영실), under the instruction of King Sejong, made a better iron movable type printing with the purpose of printing out the newly published Hoon-Min Jung-Eum (book on Korean alphabet). (Wikimachine 05:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.samboart.co.kr/information/info03.html |
|
|
|
|
|
"⑶ 구리 활자 : 고려 고종 21년(1234)에 만들어 최 윤의(催允儀)가 집필한 ‘상정고금예문’ 50권을 인쇄하였다. 이것은 독일의 구텐베르그가 금속 활자를 발명한 것보다 211년 앞서는 것이었다." (Wikimachine 05:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
He made the 1st iron movable type printing. He's an inventor. Chinese made the 1st wooden movable type printing. Thanks Appleby. (Wikimachine 05:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
You are so persistent! I suspected that you were Korean. So am I, but I'm not good in my native language... so I'll type in English. |
|
|
|
|
|
Here it says that Chwe Yoon Eye made & printed with that iron movable type. |
|
|
|
|
|
"세계에 널리 알려지지는 않았으나, 사실은 우리 조상이 세계 최초늬 금속 활자를 발명하였읍느다. 고려 인종 때 쵀윤의가 지은 <상정고금에문> (에절에 관한 글을 모은 책)을 고려 고종 21년 (1234년)에 처음으로 활자를 만들어 인쇄하였던 것입니다." |
|
|
|
|
|
pg. 61 웅진위인전기 11 장영실 by 백석기. (c) 1987 웅진출판주식회사 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Appleby for your fervent effort to spread Korean culture and history. (Wikimachine 17:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)) |
|
|
|
|
|
also, in my previous post, i put this: http://www.samboart.co.kr/information/info03.html |
|
|
|
|
|
"⑶ 구리 활자 : 고려 고종 21년(1234)에 만들어 최 윤의(催允儀)가 집필한 ‘상정고금예문’ 50권을 인쇄하였다. 이것은 독일의 구텐베르그가 금속 활자를 발명한 것보다 211년 앞서는 것이었다." (Wikimachine 17:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)) I hope that this helps." |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Sunday Times Golden Globe Race == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the comment! I'm glad you enjoyed the article. — ] ] 15:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Question == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've posted a question to you on ] -] 18:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:There is a process for deleting categories - ]. I think it's only fiar to put things back the way they were, then go through the normal procedure. Do you have any problem with that? -] 06:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Yes. It's pointless. If someone has an objection, they can move it back and we can redo it with the added rigmarole. ] 18:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Well, I do have an objection so I'll move it back and then you can propose the change formally. -] 20:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Okay. ] 23:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Your admonition == |
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure what your comments on my talk page are refering to. I do not subscribe to the pedophilia obsession which demeans or belittles others, though the ugly reality of that witch hunt cannot be denied. I welcome your interest in editing the article on pederasty, though I would request that you observe closely the principles of this project - especially important in matters that tend to roil the emotions, such as the intersection of youth and sexuality. Regarding my reversal of your edit, perhaps I should have explained myself more fully. I have now done so, ]. Regards, ] 04:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== User page == |
|
|
|
|
|
I received a complaint about your user page because it contains material which seems rather gruesome. I'm not sure whether it is intended seriously, humorously, or ironically, but what you ahve there now is rather antagonistic. While we're at Misplaced Pages, our jobs are to verifiably summarize reliable sources using the neutral point of view, not axpress opinions. I'm not complaining about your editing, just the user page. Your consideration is appreciated. Cheers, -] 08:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Okay. ] 16:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks. -] 21:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Welcome! == |
|
|
Hi JayW, thanks for joining ] and contributing in that area. It's hard finding good editors who are not all emotional and stuff on the subject. |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, thanks for the reminder on the gas masks. I always try to keep mine handy. Although another way of looking at things is:<br clear=all> |
|
|
]<br clear=all>] 05:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Terrorism == |
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest before you revert the terrorism point again you join the discussion on the talk page for the ]. This item was discussed before the last change was made. You may want to propose an alternative in the lead, such as "has advocated the use of violence to instill terror in blacks and civil rights supporters" or "has been found guilty of organizing campaigns of violence". The cite to the discussion of terrorism has both sides of the argument; not participating in the discussion on the talk page is likely to lead to a circular revert war. ] 19:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Thanks == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jay, thanks for the shoutout on ]. I'm glad someone noticed because it has been a grind. IngBeth Larssons's paper was a godsend, though, because it surveys so many other papers. Plus he's (she's?) Swedish, so no one can call him (her?) a prude and stuff. I sure wish I could get my hands on the that Glenn Ramsy study, though. 16%? Yeesh... ] 01:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:It's on , if you have access to it. ] 01:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Habbo Hotel == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the revision on the image. The image and caption now match the content much better. ] <small>(])</small> 04:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
==Image Tagging for ]== |
|
|
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on using images, see the following pages: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 05:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Diverse Habbo.png)== |
|
|
|
|
|
{| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|This file may be '''deleted'''. |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. ] <sub><font color="green">// bornhj</font> ]</sub> 04:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== re ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I went kind of medieval on this article (at least on the talk page; I didn't change anything in the article -- yet -- except the "Slang terms" section). I'd be interested in your take on this article. Was I too harsh? The article's been tagged as ] for a while, and it ''does'' kind of read like somebody's essay -- a reasonably ''good'' essay, with many of the assertions probably true, but still an essay. I'd like to see it be more scientific and stuff. ---- |
|
|
:No, I think you'd be right to cut it down. It's not very good. ] 20:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== List of Internet phenomena == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! I have reverted your removal of ] from ]. This has been discussed a while ago and, if I recall correctly, there was a consensus that it belongs there. If you oppose that, please discuss the issue on the ] first. By the way, ‘lol’ is not a very efficient ]; please consider using more meaningful summaries when editing articles in the future to make it easier for other editors to understand your edits. —]<sub>]</sub> 20:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:The burden of proof is on you, not me. See ]. ] 20:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Reliable sources == |
|
|
|
|
|
I removed your citations from ] because they do not appear to meet the standard of ]. "Personal websites, blogs, and other self-published or vanity publications should not be used as secondary sources." I doubt there is much informaton on this topic to be found in reliable sources. (Normally I'd post a message about an edit on the article talk page, but it's so busy there I thought I'd slip this to you over here). Cheers, -] 07:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, is this ]? -] 21:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yes. ] 21:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== urk, footnotes == |
|
|
Hi Jay. At ], if I'm reading the history correctly, which I might not be as it's very active right now, anyway, the preferred method for footnotes is '''<nowiki><ref>http://www.someurl.com</ref> </nowiki>''' at the point of the footnote. A '''<nowiki><references/></nowiki>''' at the end in a Notes section automatically gathers them all together. |
|
|
|
|
|
There is an older method, which has the advantage of allowing text to be included with the footnote, but which is deprecated and subject to redaction by enthusiastic bots. But at any rate simple numbered footnotes are not part of Wikistyle. ] 00:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:k, I didn't add those, though. ] 00:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::Right, oops, sorry, it was the original creator, I got bolixed up, nevmind. Cheers, ] 17:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==David Ben-Gurion== |
|
|
Please add your support to ] on the ]. Respectfully, ] 16:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Howdy, I noticed your restoration of material I removed from the ] article. Although you are correct that the material was cited (albeit incompletely), there is a discussion on the talk page about the removal. The sentiment of the discussants at the present is that the material is unnecessary. I have additional questions about the nature of the source (being that court transcripts are usually not published with an opinion, and are not usually considered part of the opinion. Just wanted to make you aware of the discussion on the talk page and encourage your opinion there. Thanks, --] 20:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please remove message from your userpage == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please remove the message about your being an 11-year-old girl from your userpage. This is '''not''' the way to protest policy, or do whatever it is that you are doing. I find your edit summary, "''MUAHAHAHA THE POOR INNOCENT CHILDREN WILL NEVER KNOW''", especially offensive. Despite the fact that you are (probably) making a joke, this behaviour is unbecoming of an editor and is bad for the project as a whole. Please keep your criticism of ideas to dialog and refrain from making ]s. ]<sub>]</sub> 00:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
: :'( How'd you see past my clever ruse? Your Critical Thinking Skills® must be pretty good. :0 And I'll cease my terribly unbecoming behavior immediantly. ] 00:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Saqqara Bird== |
|
|
I have nominated ] for ]. If accepted it will appear in the Did You know section of the ]. Cheers.--] 00:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==DYK== |
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|] |
|
|
|On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |
|
|
|} <!-- ], ] --> |
|
|
:HURRAH!! ] 18:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. You contributed to the discussion at ]. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal ''']''', thanks. ~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
:I am surprised by your view that the proposed policy 'facilitates the rape of children'. The discussion about the policy is difficult enough already without the addition of satire and irony. Would you like to clarify your view? ] 20:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I am surprised by your view that the proposed policy 'facilitates the rape of children'. The discussion about the policy is difficult enough already without the addition of satire and irony. Would you like to clarify your view? ] 20:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::My comment is not "satire or irony," thank you. Aside from very obvious practical concerns - the policy, as it is, is completely useless and based on a myth - the promotion of this myth is a key blocker, , to ending abuse which is ''not'' mythical. ] 20:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Please remain civil == |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: --] - '']'' - ] 20:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:I have. ] 20:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Sorry, no you haven't. I've blocked you for 24 hours for incivility and trolling. --] - '']'' - ] 23:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Please show me where I have been "incivil." And since you blocked me, you ought to at least add the following to ] I was editing before your ever-civil accusations of "trolling" greeted me: |
|
|
|
|
|
Instances and since my warning. I have also added the requested material to the page linked above. --] - '']'' - ] 23:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Swearing is not incivil, in my opinion. ] 00:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Not by itself, no. --] - '']'' - ] 23:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
---- |
|
|
note to self: update ] w/ |
|
|
|
|
|
==Blocked== |
|
|
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. are inappropriate. <font color="#0000FF">]</font> 04:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yet mass libel is appropriate? Fascinating. ] 04:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please consider joining me in filing an RFC over the ] links issue. == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to keep this as narrow as possible, and focus only on the links section. If you're interested, could I ask you to provide me with: |
|
|
|
|
|
a) a few diffs illustrating reversions on the article page that reflect bias on the part of career editors there |
|
|
|
|
|
b) (if you feel like it) specific instances of incivility or bias you encounted on the talk page there. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, ] 12:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==You helped choose ] as this week's ] winner== |
|
|
<div style="text-align: center; margin: 0 10%;"> |
|
|
{| class="notice noprint" id="{{{id}}}" style="background: #ffccFF; border: 1px solid #ff33FF; margin: 0 auto;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| Thank you for your support of the ''']'''.<br>This week ''']''' was selected to be improved to ] ].<br>Hope you can help. |
|
|
|} |
|
|
</div> <sub>→<font style="color:#975612">]]]</font><font style="color:#325596">]</font></sub> 00:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
==Orphaned non-free image (Image:GLogo.png)== |
|
|
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 01:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
==]== |
|
|
] |
|
|
Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also ] and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at ]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> ] (]) 04:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Orphaned non-free media (File:Fuhrman promo.jpg)== |
|
|
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] nomination of ] == |
|
|
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). |
|
|
|
|
|
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). |
|
|
|
|
|
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nomination of ] for deletion == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion has begun about whether the article ], which you created or to which you contributed, should be ]. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, ] and a clue-bat • <sup>(])</sup> 03:24, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
|