Misplaced Pages

User:DreamGuy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:34, 31 October 2010 editSweetCarmenEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)1 editNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:37, 31 October 2010 edit undoNawlinWiki (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators221,643 editsm Reverted edits by SweetCarmenEncyclopedist (talk) to last version by DreamGuyNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{boxboxtop}}
:''For the card game sometimes known as "Asshole", see ]. For the chemical compound, see ].''
{{Senior Editor II Userbox}} <!-- between years of anon edits before signing up and edits while not signed in, this is actually a very conservative estimation of total edits -->
{{User:Scepia/published book}}
{{Template:user respect IP}}
{{User WikiProject Spam}}
{{User WikiProject Images & Media}}
{{User WikiProject Rational Skepticism}}
{{User:Cliftonian/Templates/UBX/engagement}}
{{boxboxbottom}}


==About DreamGuy==
'''Asshole''' or '''arsehole''' (outside of ]) is a ] term referring to the ]. The word is mainly used as a ] towards someone the speaker does not like or to express deep contempt for someone whose behavior is hurtful, self-centered or particularly abrasive. Usually, the person to whom this term is directed is a male. It may also sometimes be used to describe people who are viewed as "stupid" or "useless."


Usually what I end up doing is undoing really bad edits by other people: spam, hoaxes, trying to put their own opinion into an article as if anyone else cares, and so forth.
This word or its literal translation is found in colloquial speech in a number of ]s (in both ] and other ]s). This is due to the fact that it describes an ] of ] that is considered a ] region (belonging to the ]) of the body in many ].


The good thing about Misplaced Pages is anyone who spots something wrong can change it. The bad thing about Misplaced Pages is all the people who want things to be wrong (either from bias or cluelessness) outnumber the rest, and the worst editors (lack of real world credentials, strongest bias, dedicated spammers, here for the social aspects and not to have solid information online) devote the most time to it.
The English word ''ass'' (meaning ], derived from the same root as its zoological name ''Equus '''asinus''''') may also be used as a term of contempt, referring to a silly or stupid person. In ], the words ''arse'' and ''ass'' have become ]ous; however in the rest of the world, ''ass'' still only refers to the donkey, rather than the ''arse'' (]s). It is worth noting that some varieties of English ], leading to practically identical pronunciations of ''ass'' and ''arse''.


==The eternal struggle==
Until the early 1990s, the word was considered one of a number of words that could not be uttered on commercial television in the United States. Comedian ] caused a major shock when he uttered the word during a televised awards show in the 1980s. By 1994, however, the word had become less vulgar, and was often featured in dialogue on the long-running television series '']''; it has yet to become anything close to commonplace on network TV, however. It is important to note that while the word ''ass'' has found a place on broadcast television, ''asshole'' is not used, probably due to its more vulgar connotation.
]
''The Misplaced Pages philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment.''


::::'''&mdash;], from '''
In 1993, actor ] enjoyed some success with a comedic song called "Asshole" which opened his stage play '']'' and was featured in a ] . It topped the ] in Australia and subsequently reached #2 on the charts in that country in 1994. Alternative rock artist ] has written and recorded a song called "Asshole," one of his most acclaimed compositions. The British ska-punk band ] also have a song named "Arsehole." In 2004, the song "Asshole" by the band ] was used as the soundtrack to a popular internet filmstrip about the Bush administration.
{{clear}}
==Useful templates==


'''Two I made:'''
Asshat is a slightly more trendy and less severe variation of ''asshole,'' graphically describing someone who has his "head up his ass" (i.e., not knowing what's going on), or a variation of "butthead". In the former sense, it is suggested that one is wearing one's ass for a hat, or alternately, a hat for one's ass (Some people view it as that from the waist up, you are a hat for your own ass.). A more modern usage of ''asshat'' describes a person doing something stupid, and can apply to anyone: "The boss is up to asshattery because he broke the computer even though he knew he was doing the wrong thing." This meaning was popularized by ] character ]
*fictionlist - for nonfiction articles overrun by lists of fiction/music/popular culture making reference to the topic
*fictioncruft - for fiction articles that just has way too many nonnotable examples listed


'''Tagging articles/sections:'''
The word is popular in many online communities, serving as a more palatable version of its antecedent. According to ]'s Usenet statistics, the word only saw a token appearance every day or two starting in July, 1999, but following a slow rise in 2002, it entered popular usage in May, 2003.
*advert - article reading like ad
*plot - plot summary overly long
*cleanup-laundry - overly long lists
*examplefarm - listcruft
*external links - for just too many
*cleanup-spam - for the hardcore bad links
*trivia - for section named trivia
*unencyclopedic - whole section/article needs to go away
*disputed & disputed-section - factual problems
*POV & POV-section - for the pushers
*importance - article not encyclopedic
*importance-s - section


'''Tagging specific lines:'''
As it continued to grow in ], asshat began to be used by online gamers, in first person shooter and massive multiplayer role playing games. It was a commonplace word on servers where ] language was not allowed.
*fact - cite source here, please
*who - who says this?
*POV-statement - this part here is biased
*or - somebody is just pontificating here on their own, aren't they?


'''Warning users:'''
The insult "assclown" is used in a similar fashion, although it is not as common. "Assclown" has become well known among fans of the ] due to wrestler ] using it during his promos, especially his "Highlight Reel"; the term was also famously used in the film '']'' to describe singer-songwriter ].
*] has templates for warning editors that what they are doing is not allowed


<!-- useful link to hold onto: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=200624864&oldid=200624161 shows editors agreeing that Arcayne has been harassing me, that people complaining are trying to game the system, etc. Current Arb enforcement discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement&diff=228271398&oldid=228270687 get link to update when that closes -->
]
]
]
]
]

]
]

Revision as of 12:37, 31 October 2010

Userboxes
This editor is a Senior Editor II and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.
This user has published a book.
This user respects copyright and other intellectual property rights.
This user participates in WikiProject Spam.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Images and Media
This user is a participant in WikiProject Skepticism.

User:Cliftonian/Templates/UBX/engagement

About DreamGuy

Usually what I end up doing is undoing really bad edits by other people: spam, hoaxes, trying to put their own opinion into an article as if anyone else cares, and so forth.

The good thing about Misplaced Pages is anyone who spots something wrong can change it. The bad thing about Misplaced Pages is all the people who want things to be wrong (either from bias or cluelessness) outnumber the rest, and the worst editors (lack of real world credentials, strongest bias, dedicated spammers, here for the social aspects and not to have solid information online) devote the most time to it.

The eternal struggle

The Misplaced Pages philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment.

Lore Sjöberg, from "The Misplaced Pages FAQK"

Useful templates

Two I made:

  • fictionlist - for nonfiction articles overrun by lists of fiction/music/popular culture making reference to the topic
  • fictioncruft - for fiction articles that just has way too many nonnotable examples listed

Tagging articles/sections:

  • advert - article reading like ad
  • plot - plot summary overly long
  • cleanup-laundry - overly long lists
  • examplefarm - listcruft
  • external links - for just too many
  • cleanup-spam - for the hardcore bad links
  • trivia - for section named trivia
  • unencyclopedic - whole section/article needs to go away
  • disputed & disputed-section - factual problems
  • POV & POV-section - for the pushers
  • importance - article not encyclopedic
  • importance-s - section

Tagging specific lines:

  • fact - cite source here, please
  • who - who says this?
  • POV-statement - this part here is biased
  • or - somebody is just pontificating here on their own, aren't they?

Warning users:


Categories: