| Revision as of 20:17, 3 November 2010 editDangerousPanda (talk | contribs)38,827 edits blocked indef, arbcom only← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:20, 3 November 2010 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,759 edits remove exchange that included possible legal threats and uncivil responsesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired}} | |||
| I am waiting one week, if by then the crap linking my name to porn websites and criminal gangs is not scrubbed i will seek advice on how to have that achieved. I will have no part of a site which allows a user to be smeared in this manner. Please perma block this account so i can`t return. I must also insist the allegations of racism now being posted also be scrubbed, and petri had better fucking stop smearing me right fucking now ] (]) 13:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi Mark, just wanted to let you know that I at least find it unfortunate that your name has to be at the top of the SPI (aside, I think the section you want blanked has already been scrubbed). There's clearly an abusive use of proxies going on and it would be nice to determine the master of the proxies and some method of shutting him or her down. Given the difficulty in finding the proxy master, it probably would have been better to have the whole thing over at ]. As it stands, Petri Krohn and TFD seem far too enthusiastic about connecting you to the whole mess, which is adding unhelpful noise to trying to sort things out. ] (] <small>•</small> ] <small>•</small> ]) 12:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| * - Morning Mark, please stay calm just a little bit longer .. take the high road, there are committee members and experienced editors looking at the details and it should be cleared up soon. ] (]) 13:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: MN - First, please be careful of the ] policy. You're dangerously close to it. You can make your point without using the magic words. I would suggest requesting to FloNight that ] in the SPI. Second, I posted a comment on the SPI page. I don't think you're socking - frankly, I would be fairly shocked if you were. I think you're seen more than enough evidence that editors familiar with an editors style can spot them fairly quickly and have no problem taking action, and I think you're smart enough to realize that. Even with the anonymous networks, it's still fairly easy to spot a sock. It doesn't help that you went from one contentious area to another. But even if you are, much of the evidence could have been e-mailed privately. The manner it was done smacks of a deliberate attempt to vilify you, far beyond even the attacks on blogs towards various editors in the CC area. I saw FloNight's post to you - at this point, you're best bet is to be as helpful as you can and keep a low profile for a while. Best of luck. <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 15:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| You may wish to respond to this posting at ANI. ] (]) 18:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Go fuck yourself you sick twisted sack of shite ] (]) 20:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ...and thanks to the above violation of ], I have extended the block to indef, and removed talkpage access. Unblock requests can be directed to ArbCom directly from this point on. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 20:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | ...and thanks to the above violation of ], I have extended the block to indef, and removed talkpage access. Unblock requests can be directed to ArbCom directly from this point on. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 20:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 3 November 2010
...and thanks to the above violation of WP:NPA, I have extended the block to indef, and removed talkpage access. Unblock requests can be directed to ArbCom directly from this point on. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)