| Revision as of 13:56, 14 November 2010 editNymf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,196 edits →Your edits: note on copyvio← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:10, 14 November 2010 edit undoNeptunekh2 (talk | contribs)3,401 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Hi Neptunekh2: | Hi Neptunekh2: | ||
| This is not meant to be critical of you, I am just a bit curious. Why do you think that Happy-Go-Lucky should be classified as an LGBT film? The subject is not one which is overt in the film What are your thoughts? Thank you(] (]) 13:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)) | This is not meant to be critical of you, I am just a bit curious. Why do you think that Happy-Go-Lucky should be classified as an LGBT film? The subject is not one which is overt in the film What are your thoughts? Thank you(] (]) 13:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)) | ||
| == Your edits == | |||
| Your edits are becoming rather disruptive. I see people having to revert you like all the time. Edits like is not very helpful either, as it is simply misplaced. You are no doubt editing in good faith, but please put more thought into your edits. Thank you. ] <sub>]</sub> 13:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :And copyvio edits such as (stolen from ) are simply not okay either. I'll have to bring this to ANI if I find any more cases. ] <sub>]</sub> 13:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:10, 14 November 2010
Please do not vandalise Misplaced Pages pages, as you did in this edit on the page Carla Kihlstedt. And please do not blank your own talk page. It makes it a lot harder for all of us to find out why you blanked what. Mark in wiki (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Neptunekh2: This is not meant to be critical of you, I am just a bit curious. Why do you think that Happy-Go-Lucky should be classified as an LGBT film? The subject is not one which is overt in the film What are your thoughts? Thank you(Galaxycat (talk) 13:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC))