| Revision as of 23:02, 17 November 2010 editYuubi (talk | contribs)36 edits →JWH-018 legality in NC: linkage tyop← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:33, 13 January 2011 edit undoErgoSum88 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,254 edits archive talkNext edit → |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
* add this page to your watchlist or |
|
* add this page to your watchlist or |
|
* request that I use the {{tl|Talkback}} template on your user talk page.}} |
|
* request that I use the {{tl|Talkback}} template on your user talk page.}} |
|
<!--{{Talkback|Davemeistermoab}}--> |
|
|
---- |
|
---- |
|
{{archive box collapsible|auto=no| |
|
{{archive box collapsible|auto=no| |
| Line 19: |
Line 18: |
|
'''2010'''<br> |
|
'''2010'''<br> |
|
*] |
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
{{multicol-end}} |
|
{{multicol-end}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
__FORCETOC__ |
|
__FORCETOC__ |
|
|
|
|
== Thanks == |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all your hard work on the ]. It is a random, but interesting topic. ] (]) 13:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:Congratulations - I remember this one from peer review, great to see it on the Main Page! ] ''']''' 17:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== You are now a Reviewer == |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
Hello. Your account has been granted the "<tt>reviewer<tt>" userright, allowing you to to ] on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a ] at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not ] to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious ] or ], and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see ]). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. <!-- Template:Reviewer-notice --> ] (]) 17:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Mind giving an article a review? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Ergosum, How's life? Long time no talk. When you have some time, could you review ]? I honestly thought I had everything worked out, but it failed FAC with 1 oppose vote for "needs a copyedit". Which is fair, I'm the first to admit I'm a sloppy writer. Anyways, the FAC is over and done with, so no rush. I was just hoping to get some extra eyes so I could re-submit in a few months. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks much |
|
|
] (]) 20:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Yeah I'll see what I can do for it. I'm so tired right now I can't even muster up small talk... so I will see you later! --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">]•]•]</span> 00:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks. There's no hurry. Get some rest! ] (]) 02:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks for the review. FYI, 1950 was the last census where Thistle was counted as a seperate city. As such, there are no figures for 1960 or 1970. One of the sources estimates the population at about 50 by 1983. Also, I'm not sure what a beanery is either. ] (]) 03:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Also, if you don't mind. I found a couple of more pics in my archives. Is the number of pics ok? or is that now too many? ] (]) 04:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::The number of pics looks fine to me, but I'm using a netbook with a tiny screen. Perhaps a disclaimer noting 1950 as the last year census figures are available would be appropriate. And as far as "beanery" goes, I googled it and was given the definition "an inexpensive restaurant", which was not what I had envisioned! I was picturing a warehouse where workers process beans or something. --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">]•]•]</span> 02:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Thanks for doing that. ] (]) 02:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== scorpian mezcal??????? == |
|
|
|
|
|
uuuuuuuu iiiiiiii!... scary] (]) 01:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== JWH-018 legality in NC == |
|
|
|
|
|
Your of ] whose comment says "update arkansas" actually updated NC. I added a to the talk page; can you comment there? ] (]) 23:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
|
