Misplaced Pages

Leo Strauss: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:02, 10 June 2004 editHerschelkrustofsky (talk | contribs)2,877 edits →Political Straussians← Previous edit Revision as of 20:00, 10 June 2004 edit undo4.171.57.129 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


'''Straussianism''', as Strauss's philosophy has come to be called, '''Straussianism''', as Strauss's philosophy has come to be called,
is predicated on the belief that 20th century ] has is predicated on the belief that 20th century ], ], ], and ] has
been responsible for the deterioration of been responsible for the deterioration of
⚫ ]. Some Straussians believe that "universal principles of right" exist and are knowable through careful study of those philosophers who believed in such principles, especially ]
]. According to its advocates, modern ] devalues philosophy by rejecting anything that
⚫ cannot be understood by the "common man". Some Straussians believe that "universal principles of right" exist and are knowable through careful study of those philosophers who believed in such principles, especially ]
and ]. They reject the modern tendency to interpret and ]. They reject the modern tendency to interpret
the ancient philosophers within the context of the era in which the ancient philosophers within the context of the era in which
they lived, believing that universal principles transcend they lived, believing that universal principles transcend
]. However, it is unwise to characterize Straussians, because, they are not unanimous in their interpretation of their mentor's ideas; in a curious "catch-22", Strauss' own ideas are subject (under Strauss' own doctrine) to both an ''exoteric'', and an ''esoteric'' interpretation (see below.) ]. However, it is unwise to characterize Straussians, because, they are not unanimous in their interpretation of their mentor's ideas; in a curious "catch-22", Strauss' own ideas are subject (under Strauss' own doctrine) to both an ''exoteric'', and an ''esoteric'' interpretation.


⚫ Strauss taught that the texts of truly "great" philosophers

Straussians also believe that the public is not capable of understanding
or accepting the universal principles of right. Therefore, they
posit the rectitude of the "noble lie" which shields the uneducated
public from knowledge of unpalatable truth, for which the public
might hold the philosopher to blame (as happened with ]).
This leads to a dichotomy, within Straussianism, between
] and exoteric knowledge. Esoteric knowledge
is reserved for the elite philosopher while exoteric knowledge is
carefully crafted by the philosopher for everyone else, and often
obfuscates the true understanding and intention of the philosopher.
⚫ Indeed, Strauss thought that the texts of truly "great" philosophers
contained both an esoteric and an exoteric level and that the contained both an esoteric and an exoteric level and that the
esoteric component was accessible only to the reader willing to esoteric component was accessible only to those readers willing to carefully analyze and resolve subtle, inherent contradictions within the text. ] and ] he believed, were such philosophers.
carefully analyze and resolve subtle, inherent contradictions within
the text. ], he believed, was such a philosopher.


==Political Straussians== ==Political Straussians==


Among Strauss's better known protégés are ] and ]. Straussianism has been supported and extended to the modern political arena by ], notably ] and ], who pursued his Doctorate in political science at the University of Chicago during Strauss's tenure there. Straussians have little presence in contemporary academic philosophy or classical studies. Among Strauss's better known protégés are ] and ]. Straussianism has been supported and extended to the modern political arena by ], notably ] and ], who pursued his Doctorate in political science at the University of Chicago during Strauss's tenure there.

==Criticism of Straussianism==

⚫ In April of 2003, a report, entitled ''Children of Satan'', was issued by the presidential campaign of Democratic pre-candidate ]. It provided evidence that a tightly-knit grouping of professed Straussians, which included ], ], ], ] (executive director of the ]), and others, had succeeded in gaining hegemonic control of policy in the administration of President ]. LaRouche characterized Strauss as a "Nazi philosopher," citing his close personal and political relationship to Nazi "Crown Jurist" ], although nowhere in his writings does Strauss state that he was a follower of ]. LaRouche charged that this grouping had pursued a policy of deception and disinformation, particularly through the creation of the Pentagon ], which had lured the United States into a misbegotten doctrine of ], particularly in Iraq.

⚫ Within a month of the appearance of ''Children of Satan,'' similar exposés appeared in the ''New York Times,'' the ''New Yorker,'' and other publications, followed by a series of rebuttals in the ''Wall Street Journal.''

==Quotes==

*"'All there is to thinking is seeing something noticeable, which makes you see something you weren't noticing, which makes you see something that isn't even visible.'" - ] on esotericism.


==Bibliography==
⚫ In April of 2003, a report, entitled ''Children of Satan'', was issued by the presidential campaign of Democratic pre-candidate ]. It provided evidence that a tightly-knit grouping of professed Straussians, which included ], ], ], ] (executive director of the ]), and others, had succeeded in gaining hegemonic control of policy in the administration of President ]. LaRouche characterized Strauss as a "Nazi philosopher," citing his close personal and political relationship to Nazi "Crown Jurist" ]. LaRouche charged that this grouping had pursued a policy of deception and disinformation, particularly through the creation of the Pentagon ], which had lured the United States into a misbegotten doctrine of ], particularly in Iraq.


*]
⚫ Within a month of the appearance of ''Children of Satan,'' similar exposés appeared in the ''New York Times,'' the ''New Yorker,'' and other publications, followed by a series of angry rebuttals in the ''Wall Street Journal.''
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*], co-editor
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


===External links=== ===External links===


* *
* *
* *
*
*
*
*


===References=== ===References===

Revision as of 20:00, 10 June 2004

Leo Strauss (September 20, 1899 - October 18, 1973), the political philosopher, was born in Kirchhain (near Marburg), Hessen, Germany, to Hugo Strauss and Jennie David, and was raised in an Orthodox Jewish home. At the age of 17 he became a political Zionist. Strauss received his higher education within the German university system, notably at Marburg, Hamburg, Giessen, and Berlin. He was influenced by the work of Martin Heidegger, Max Weber, and Thomas Hobbes.

In 1932, Strauss married Marie Bernsohn in Paris, France. In 1934 he moved to England where, in 1935, he accepted a position at the Cambridge University. In 1937, Strauss moved to the United States where he became a Research Fellow in the Department of History at Columbia University. Between 1938 and 1948, he lectured in political science at the New School for Social Research. In 1944, he became a US citizen and from 1949 until 1973, Strauss served as a member of the faculty of the University of Chicago, chiefly as a professor of political philosophy.

In Saul Bellow's quasi-biographical novel Ravelstein, the minor character Davarr is reputed to have been based on Strauss, while the central character of Ravelstein is said to represent Strauss' protegé Allan Bloom.

Philosophy

Straussianism, as Strauss's philosophy has come to be called, is predicated on the belief that 20th century relativism, scientism, historicism, and nihilism has been responsible for the deterioration of modern society. Some Straussians believe that "universal principles of right" exist and are knowable through careful study of those philosophers who believed in such principles, especially Plato and Aristotle. They reject the modern tendency to interpret the ancient philosophers within the context of the era in which they lived, believing that universal principles transcend historicity. However, it is unwise to characterize Straussians, because, they are not unanimous in their interpretation of their mentor's ideas; in a curious "catch-22", Strauss' own ideas are subject (under Strauss' own doctrine) to both an exoteric, and an esoteric interpretation.

Strauss taught that the texts of truly "great" philosophers contained both an esoteric and an exoteric level and that the esoteric component was accessible only to those readers willing to carefully analyze and resolve subtle, inherent contradictions within the text. Machiavelli and Plato he believed, were such philosophers.

Political Straussians

Among Strauss's better known protégés are Allan Bloom and Francis Fukuyama. Straussianism has been supported and extended to the modern political arena by U.S. neoconservatives, notably Michael Ledeen and Paul Wolfowitz, who pursued his Doctorate in political science at the University of Chicago during Strauss's tenure there.

Criticism of Straussianism

In April of 2003, a report, entitled Children of Satan, was issued by the presidential campaign of Democratic pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche. It provided evidence that a tightly-knit grouping of professed Straussians, which included Wolfowitz, William Kristol, Abram Shulsky, Gary Schmitt (executive director of the Project for the New American Century), and others, had succeeded in gaining hegemonic control of policy in the administration of President George W. Bush. LaRouche characterized Strauss as a "Nazi philosopher," citing his close personal and political relationship to Nazi "Crown Jurist" Carl Schmitt, although nowhere in his writings does Strauss state that he was a follower of Carl Schmitt. LaRouche charged that this grouping had pursued a policy of deception and disinformation, particularly through the creation of the Pentagon Office of Special Plans, which had lured the United States into a misbegotten doctrine of preventive war, particularly in Iraq.

Within a month of the appearance of Children of Satan, similar exposés appeared in the New York Times, the New Yorker, and other publications, followed by a series of rebuttals in the Wall Street Journal.

Quotes

  • "'All there is to thinking is seeing something noticeable, which makes you see something you weren't noticing, which makes you see something that isn't even visible.'" - Seth Benardete on esotericism.

Bibliography

External links

References

  • Ted V. McAllister. 1996. "Revolt Against Modernity : Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin & the Search for Postliberal Order". Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
  • Leo Strauss. 1958. "Thoughts on Machiavelli". Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.