| Revision as of 05:25, 17 December 2010 editCalibrador (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,115 edits →New Kidney in Town← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:26, 17 December 2010 edit undoCalibrador (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,115 edits →New Kidney in TownNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::You miss the entire point of the article. It doesn't exist to have two sentences in a plot summary, it exists to be expanded. Information is always released leading up to the episodes's air date, and it is intellectually dishonest not to acknowledge that. Simply deleting or redirecting the article to save face for a week is the true definition of ignorance. ] (]) 05:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ::You miss the entire point of the article. It doesn't exist to have two sentences in a plot summary, it exists to be expanded. Information is always released leading up to the episodes's air date, and it is intellectually dishonest not to acknowledge that. Simply deleting or redirecting the article to save face for a week is the true definition of ignorance. ] (]) 05:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy redirect''' to ]. This article has been redirected before, now this time the article has no sources. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 05:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | *'''Speedy redirect''' to ]. This article has been redirected before, now this time the article has no sources. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 05:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :The article has the same amount of sources it previously had, with the new information being referenced by the same exact source as was previously available. You made no mention of references in your last anowball attempt to redirect the article, and your involvement in this project is |
:The article has the same amount of sources it previously had, with the new information being referenced by the same exact source as was previously available. You made no mention of references in your last anowball attempt to redirect the article, and your involvement in this project is, and has always been, unwelcome. ] (]) 05:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:26, 17 December 2010
New Kidney in Town
AfDs for this article:- New Kidney in Town (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was previous redirected due to lack of information. Now without any new references, it was recreated with just a brief plot summary that can be in Family Guy (season 9) JDDJS (talk) 05:02, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep The same reference provides the plot information. This information was previously unavailable, and was the only reason given by the two users who voted to redirect the article to the main list. Additionally, your citing of WP:CRYSTAL is irrelevent, as this article does nothing to violate any of the guidelines given. Simply adding redundant references confirming the same information is not necessary, and the deletion of an article that will be expanded regardless is inessential. Gage (talk) 05:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- You missed the entire point. The plot summary is in the season 9 article. There is no info on the page that can't be found on the season 9 page. Plot summary alone is never enough to justify an entire article about an episode of a tv show, JDDJS (talk) 05:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- You miss the entire point of the article. It doesn't exist to have two sentences in a plot summary, it exists to be expanded. Information is always released leading up to the episodes's air date, and it is intellectually dishonest not to acknowledge that. Simply deleting or redirecting the article to save face for a week is the true definition of ignorance. Gage (talk) 05:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy redirect to Family Guy (season 9). This article has been redirected before, now this time the article has no sources. JJ98 (Talk) 05:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- The article has the same amount of sources it previously had, with the new information being referenced by the same exact source as was previously available. You made no mention of references in your last anowball attempt to redirect the article, and your involvement in this project is, and has always been, unwelcome. Gage (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)