Misplaced Pages

Talk:Carl Hewitt: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:57, 4 January 2011 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsm Changed protection level of Talk:Carl Hewitt: BLP issues ( (expires 19:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)) (indefinite))← Previous edit Revision as of 02:35, 12 January 2011 edit undoCalamitybrook (talk | contribs)6,053 edits →Erdős number in introduction: Can talk page function?Next edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __] (]) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __] (]) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
:I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. ] (]) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) :I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. ] (]) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
==Does this "talk page" actually work?==
:Is there a discussion permitted here about ANYTHING??? In particular regarding additional reliable sources which might be permitted for addition regarding article in question?

:Apparently, listing sources for discussion on this page isn't permitted??
:Given this apparent fact, WHAT CAN BE DISCUSSED HERE?

:Nothing?

:When I listed merely ''for discussion'' 5-6 reliable sources, including a few major newspapers, the material was deleted and this TALK PAGE was shut down for extended period....by a single editor who has "administrator" status.
....This despite lots of editors questioning contents........
:::Very problematic??

] (]) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:35, 12 January 2011

Skip to table of contents
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Erdős number in introduction

Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __meco (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. Kevin (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Does this "talk page" actually work?

Is there a discussion permitted here about ANYTHING??? In particular regarding additional reliable sources which might be permitted for addition regarding article in question?
Apparently, listing sources for discussion on this page isn't permitted??
Given this apparent fact, WHAT CAN BE DISCUSSED HERE?
Nothing?
When I listed merely for discussion 5-6 reliable sources, including a few major newspapers, the material was deleted and this TALK PAGE was shut down for extended period....by a single editor who has "administrator" status.

....This despite lots of editors questioning contents........

Very problematic??

Calamitybrook (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories: