Misplaced Pages

Talk:Texas A&M University/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Texas A&M University Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:09, 26 February 2006 editScm83x (talk | contribs)5,620 edits rewrite to 3rd person, add a few← Previous edit Revision as of 20:12, 16 May 2006 edit undo216.207.246.230 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
* '''Ensure conformity with Wiki guidelines/policies''', including NPOV, bolding, and pictures * '''Ensure conformity with Wiki guidelines/policies''', including NPOV, bolding, and pictures
* '''Convert lists to prose''' * '''Convert lists to prose'''
* ""Rankings"" - all given as if they were facts when really within the article should be saying "ranked number 1 in petroleum according to source X"

Revision as of 20:12, 16 May 2006

  • History - expansion, possibly a full article at History of Texas A&M University. PD photos would be useful.
  • Academics - expand and condense at the same time, eliminate boosterism while expanding to ensure everything is covered
  • Athletics - spin off into different article (either Texas Aggies, taking relevant info from that article and moving it into Traditions of Texas A&M University, or Texas Aggie Athletics)
  • Notable Buildings - Possibility for removal. Buildings notable enough to be really encyclopedic get their own article, anything else can be covered by a passing mention somewhere else in the article.
  • Student Life — Expand.
  • Endowment - Requires total rewrite. How else does the University generate income other than the PUF? Perhaps include with research as at University of Michigan.
  • Notes/Sources - Fix format using <ref> and <references/> style.
  • Eliminate boosterism throughout.
  • Ensure conformity with Wiki guidelines/policies, including NPOV, bolding, and pictures
  • Convert lists to prose
  • ""Rankings"" - all given as if they were facts when really within the article should be saying "ranked number 1 in petroleum according to source X"