| Revision as of 20:40, 24 May 2011 editBurntout123 (talk | contribs)372 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:41, 24 May 2011 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,021 editsm Signing comment by Burntout123 - ""Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | ||
| Deletion of this topic is clearly against freedom of science and paradigm shifting efforts and consistent with hostile bias. | Deletion of this topic is clearly against freedom of science and paradigm shifting efforts and consistent with hostile bias. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :{{la|Burnt-out diabetes mellitus}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Burnt-out diabetes mellitus}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
Revision as of 20:41, 24 May 2011
Burnt-out diabetes mellitus
Deletion of this topic is clearly against freedom of science and paradigm shifting efforts and consistent with hostile bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burntout123 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Burnt-out diabetes mellitus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Concept not widely used, recently introduced but without clear description of notability. It is well known that people with diabetes whose renal function deteriorates need reduced insulin doses, and sometimes can completely discontinue treatment. The 2010 article did not introduce that concept. Delete. JFW | T@lk 21:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The creators do not seem to be active in the article's improvement. Subject's notability is questionable, so if this cannot be established, then definitely send it down the tubes. – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 09:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)