Misplaced Pages

Harrison Birtwistle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:50, 13 March 2006 editJGF Wilks (talk | contribs)749 edits Tidying up← Previous edit Revision as of 20:38, 13 March 2006 edit undoJGF Wilks (talk | contribs)749 edits Finished extensive additions (for the moment at least)Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
In ] Birtwistle became ] of the newly-established ] in ], a post he held until ]. He has been honoured with a ] (1988) and as a ] (2001). From ] to ] he was ] Professor of Composition at ]. In ] Birtwistle became ] of the newly-established ] in ], a post he held until ]. He has been honoured with a ] (1988) and as a ] (2001). From ] to ] he was ] Professor of Composition at ].


== Birtwistle's music == == Works ==
===Style===
It would not be easy to fit Birtwistle into any sort of 'school' or 'movement'. For a time he would be referred to as a part of the 'Manchester School', a phrase invented as a parallel to the '']'' to refer to Birtwistle, Goehr and Maxwell Davies. The phrase has, however, since fallen out of use since the three composers were united only by their early studies in Manchester, not by musical style. His music is complex, written in a modernistic style with a clear, distinctive voice. His early work is sometimes evocative of ] and ] (composers he has acknowledged as influences), and his technique of juxtaposing blocks of sound is sometimes compared to ]. His early pieces made frequent use of ]s and often had a ]istic feel. These have been toned down in recent decades as he has adapted and transformed the techniques into more subtle methods. With its strong emphasis on rhythm, the music is often described as brutal or violent, but this analysis mistakes the strong sound world for an attempt to evoke violent actions. The explicit violence of his first opera ''Punch and Judy'' - where the murder of Judy by her husband is so much more shocking when performed life on stage rather than by glove puppets in the classic British ] - can be easily misinterpreted as a clue to the intention of his abstract music. The style is stark and uncompromising, but the intent is not to arouse such images. If they were transformed into works of visual art, they would be reproduced in bold primary colours, with little use of subtle shades.


His favourite image for explaining how his pieces work is to compare it to taking a walk through a town, especially the sort of small town more common in continental Europe than Great Britain. Such a walk might start in the town square. Having explored its main features we would set off down one of the side streets. As the walk continues we might glimpse the town square down different streets, sometime a long way off, other times quite close. We may never return to the square in the rest of the walk, or we may visit a new part of it that was not explored initially. Birtwistle suggests that this experience is akin to what he does in the music. His image conveys the way that a core musical idea is altered, varied and distorted as the piece of music progresses. The core music forms a reference point to which everything else is directed, even when we are walking in a completely different direction. Sometimes we will be less aware that it is the same musical material we are hearing; sometimes we may have been listening for a while before realising that we have heard this music before (just as one might have been looking up the street before realising that it is the town square that can be glimpsed through the traffic). He is ''not'', therefore, suggesting that we imagine this walk through the town as a literal explanation of what is happening in the music; he does not 'recreate' the effect in the music (as ] does in some of his orchestral pieces.
Birtwistle's music is written in a complex, modernistic style. His early work is sometimes evocative of ] and ] (composers he has acknowledged as influences) and his technique of juxtaposing blocks of sound is sometimes compared to ]. His music makes frequent use of ]s and often has a ]istic feel. However, it would not be easy to fit Birtwistle into any sort of 'school' or 'movement'. As their names became better known within the music establishment, Birtwistle, Goehr and Maxwell Davies were referred to as the 'Manchester School' as a parallel to the term ]; the phrase has since fallen out of use since the three composers were united only by their early studies in Manchester, not by musical style.

His favourite image for explaning how his pieces work is to compare it to taking a walk through a town, especially the sort of small town more common in continental Europe than Great Britain. Such a walk might start in the town square. Having explored its main features we would set off down one of the side streets. As the walk continues we might glimpse the town square down different streets, sometime a long way off, other times quite close. We may never return to the square in the rest of the walk, or we may visit a new part of it that was not explored initially. Birtwistle suggests that this experience is akin to what he does in the music. His image conveys the way that a core musical idea is altered, varied and distorted as the piece of music progresses. The core music forms a reference point to which everything else is directed, even when we are walking in a completely different direction. Sometimes we will be less aware that it is the same musical material we are hearing; sometimes we may have been listening for a while before realising that we have heard this music before (just as one might have been looking up the street before realising that it is the town square that can be glimpsed through the traffic). He is ''not'', therefore, suggesting that we imagine this walk through the town as a literal explanation of what is happening in the music; he does not 'recreate' the effect in the music (as ] does in some of his orchestral pieces.


An early variant of this technique involved literally cutting up the music. Having composed a portion of music, Birtwistle would then cut it arbitrarily into a number of sections. These might be randomly rearranged, and new introductions and epilogues composed before composing yet more music to link them together. This method was intended to give the whole piece unity, by having musical material with its own inner coherence scattered amoungst musical material that still related to the core material but did not necessarily relate to itself. An early variant of this technique involved literally cutting up the music. Having composed a portion of music, Birtwistle would then cut it arbitrarily into a number of sections. These might be randomly rearranged, and new introductions and epilogues composed before composing yet more music to link them together. This method was intended to give the whole piece unity, by having musical material with its own inner coherence scattered amoungst musical material that still related to the core material but did not necessarily relate to itself.
Line 20: Line 20:
As a result, even when he is not writing a visual piece involving stage action, Birstwistle's music is frequently described as dramatic in construction. The music is not following the logic and rules of classic music forms such as ] but the structures of a drama. Furthermore, different musical instruments can almost be seen to take the part of different characters in the drama. This is especially apparent in a performance of ''Secret Theatre''. For various portions of the piece, a number of the instrumentalists perform in a 'soloists' capacity. For this they leave their normal seat in the orchestral group, and stand in a typical concerto soloists' position, returning to the orchestra when they are no longer given that priority. Though not normally signalled by the change of position, this sort of changing role is constantly seen in his music. Related to this would be the use of geological imagery to explain the structre of his 1986 orchestral piece ''Earth Dances''. A number of different layers of musical material are used; at any one time a layer might be to the fore, while at other times it might be buried deep under the other layers and no longer so apparent. As a result, even when he is not writing a visual piece involving stage action, Birstwistle's music is frequently described as dramatic in construction. The music is not following the logic and rules of classic music forms such as ] but the structures of a drama. Furthermore, different musical instruments can almost be seen to take the part of different characters in the drama. This is especially apparent in a performance of ''Secret Theatre''. For various portions of the piece, a number of the instrumentalists perform in a 'soloists' capacity. For this they leave their normal seat in the orchestral group, and stand in a typical concerto soloists' position, returning to the orchestra when they are no longer given that priority. Though not normally signalled by the change of position, this sort of changing role is constantly seen in his music. Related to this would be the use of geological imagery to explain the structre of his 1986 orchestral piece ''Earth Dances''. A number of different layers of musical material are used; at any one time a layer might be to the fore, while at other times it might be buried deep under the other layers and no longer so apparent.


==Popular perception of Birtwistle== ===List of major works===
''For a comprehensive list, see ].''
Though well established and widely respected in the classical music world - modules on his music feature in many University undergraduate music courses - Birtwistle was relatively unknown in the general public until the mid 1990s. Though he had been honoured with a knighthood in 1988, two events brought him to public attention.

A group of anti-modernist musicians calling themselves 'The Hecklers', led by Fredric Stocken, stunned the audience at the 1994 revivial of ''Gawain'' at the Royal Opera House, London. They disrupted the performance, drawing attention to their campaign to rid contemporary music of anything post-Romantic.

Birtwistle gained some notoriety in ] when his piece ''Panic'' for ], ] and orchestra, was ]d at that year's ]. His music had not previously been heard in so public a forum and most of the press did not hold back its negative criticism of the piece; traditionally the second half of the concert features mainstream, popular and ]. Though the first half will often incoporate pieces that reflect the overall theme of each year's season, and modern works, such an uncompromising piece had not previously been programmed.


==List of major works==
This is a chronological list of significant pieces. For a comprehensive list, see ].

*''Refrains and Choruses'' (1957), ] *''Refrains and Choruses'' (1957), ]
*''Punch and Judy'' (1967), opera *''Punch and Judy'' (1967), opera
*''The Triumph of Time'' (1971), orchestra *''The Triumph of Time'' (1971), orchestra
*''Grimethorpe Aria'' (1973), brass band *''Grimethorpe Aria'' (1973), ]
*''Silbury Air'' (1976–77), chamber orchestra *''Silbury Air'' (1976–77), chamber orchestra
*'']'' (1984), opera, which won the 1987 ] in Music Composition), *'']'' (1984), opera, which won the 1987 ] in Music Composition),
Line 45: Line 36:
*''The Last Supper'' (2000), opera *''The Last Supper'' (2000), opera


==Popular perception of Birtwistle==
Though well established and widely respected in the classical music world - modules on his music now feature in many University undergraduate music courses - Birtwistle was relatively unknown in the general public until the mid 1990s. Though he had been honoured with a knighthood in 1988, two events brought him to public attention.

A group of anti-modernist musicians calling themselves 'The Hecklers', led by Fredric Stocken, stunned the audience at the 1994 revivial of ''Gawain'' at the Royal Opera House, London. They disrupted the performance, drawing attention to their campaign to rid contemporary music of anything post-Romantic. If anything the event backfired on them, for it turned a relatively unimportant revival for the opera house into an event that many more people were keen to attend.

Birtwistle gained particular notoriety in ] when ''Panic'' was ]d at that year's ]. His music had not previously been heard in so public a forum and most of the press did not hold back its negative criticism of the piece; traditionally the second half of the concert features mainstream, popular and ]. Though the first half will often incorporate pieces that reflect the overall theme of each year's season, and modern works, such an uncompromising piece had not previously been programmed.


==Reading== ==Reading==
Line 53: Line 50:


== External links == == External links ==
*
*





Revision as of 20:38, 13 March 2006

Sir Harrison Paul Birtwistle CH (born July 15, 1934) is one of Britain's most significant contemporary composers.

Birtwistle was born in Accrington in Lancashire and in 1952 entered the Royal Manchester College of Music in Manchester on a clarinet scholarship. While there he met fellow composers Peter Maxwell Davies and Alexander Goehr, who, together with pianist John Ogdon and conductor Elgar Howarth, formed the New Music Manchester group, dedicated to the performances of serial and other modern works.

Birtwistle left the college in 1955, then studied at the Royal Academy of Music and afterward made a living as a schoolteacher. In 1965 a Harkness Fellowship gave him the opportunity to continue his studies in the United States and he decided to dedicate himself to composition.

In 1975 Birtwistle became musical director of the newly-established Royal National Theatre in London, a post he held until 1988. He has been honoured with a knighthood (1988) and as a Companion of Honour (2001). From 1994 to 2001 he was Henry Purcell Professor of Composition at King's College London.

Works

Style

It would not be easy to fit Birtwistle into any sort of 'school' or 'movement'. For a time he would be referred to as a part of the 'Manchester School', a phrase invented as a parallel to the Second Viennese School to refer to Birtwistle, Goehr and Maxwell Davies. The phrase has, however, since fallen out of use since the three composers were united only by their early studies in Manchester, not by musical style. His music is complex, written in a modernistic style with a clear, distinctive voice. His early work is sometimes evocative of Igor Stravinsky and Olivier Messiaen (composers he has acknowledged as influences), and his technique of juxtaposing blocks of sound is sometimes compared to Edgard Varèse. His early pieces made frequent use of ostinatos and often had a ritualistic feel. These have been toned down in recent decades as he has adapted and transformed the techniques into more subtle methods. With its strong emphasis on rhythm, the music is often described as brutal or violent, but this analysis mistakes the strong sound world for an attempt to evoke violent actions. The explicit violence of his first opera Punch and Judy - where the murder of Judy by her husband is so much more shocking when performed life on stage rather than by glove puppets in the classic British seaside entertainment - can be easily misinterpreted as a clue to the intention of his abstract music. The style is stark and uncompromising, but the intent is not to arouse such images. If they were transformed into works of visual art, they would be reproduced in bold primary colours, with little use of subtle shades.

His favourite image for explaining how his pieces work is to compare it to taking a walk through a town, especially the sort of small town more common in continental Europe than Great Britain. Such a walk might start in the town square. Having explored its main features we would set off down one of the side streets. As the walk continues we might glimpse the town square down different streets, sometime a long way off, other times quite close. We may never return to the square in the rest of the walk, or we may visit a new part of it that was not explored initially. Birtwistle suggests that this experience is akin to what he does in the music. His image conveys the way that a core musical idea is altered, varied and distorted as the piece of music progresses. The core music forms a reference point to which everything else is directed, even when we are walking in a completely different direction. Sometimes we will be less aware that it is the same musical material we are hearing; sometimes we may have been listening for a while before realising that we have heard this music before (just as one might have been looking up the street before realising that it is the town square that can be glimpsed through the traffic). He is not, therefore, suggesting that we imagine this walk through the town as a literal explanation of what is happening in the music; he does not 'recreate' the effect in the music (as Charles Ives does in some of his orchestral pieces.

An early variant of this technique involved literally cutting up the music. Having composed a portion of music, Birtwistle would then cut it arbitrarily into a number of sections. These might be randomly rearranged, and new introductions and epilogues composed before composing yet more music to link them together. This method was intended to give the whole piece unity, by having musical material with its own inner coherence scattered amoungst musical material that still related to the core material but did not necessarily relate to itself.

Another image for what Birtwistle frequently does in his abstract music can be seen in the events of the first Act of his opera Gawain. Up to the point where the Green Knight is knelt in front of Gawain awaiting the axe blow that will cut off his head the action has proceeded in a mainly chronolgical order. With Gawain holding the axe aloft, the stage is suddenly blacked out and within a minute the action has rewound to the point preceding the Green Knight's entry to the Court of Arthur. Events are played through again, though compressed and with various small alterations, through the beheading and into the subsequent events. The events on stage are not randomly ordered, but the one event is portrayed from more than one perspective. For the opera The Mask of Opheus this entailed two sets of singer/actors performing contradictory versions of the one event from the Orpheus myths. This non-linear portrayal of events on stage gives the listener a means of approach to the abstract compositions, with the same musical ideas being repeated but with extensive variation. The result is music that is often very episodic in structure. A readily audible example occurs in Silbury Air. Here a readily identifiable music motif - a blow from the tom-toms, followed by scurrying figures from the strings and woodwind - is elaborated in a number of different ways as the piece progresses.

As a result, even when he is not writing a visual piece involving stage action, Birstwistle's music is frequently described as dramatic in construction. The music is not following the logic and rules of classic music forms such as Sonata form but the structures of a drama. Furthermore, different musical instruments can almost be seen to take the part of different characters in the drama. This is especially apparent in a performance of Secret Theatre. For various portions of the piece, a number of the instrumentalists perform in a 'soloists' capacity. For this they leave their normal seat in the orchestral group, and stand in a typical concerto soloists' position, returning to the orchestra when they are no longer given that priority. Though not normally signalled by the change of position, this sort of changing role is constantly seen in his music. Related to this would be the use of geological imagery to explain the structre of his 1986 orchestral piece Earth Dances. A number of different layers of musical material are used; at any one time a layer might be to the fore, while at other times it might be buried deep under the other layers and no longer so apparent.

List of major works

For a comprehensive list, see List of compositions by Harrison Birtwistle.

  • Refrains and Choruses (1957), wind quintet
  • Punch and Judy (1967), opera
  • The Triumph of Time (1971), orchestra
  • Grimethorpe Aria (1973), brass band
  • Silbury Air (1976–77), chamber orchestra
  • The Mask of Orpheus (1984), opera, which won the 1987 Grawemeyer Award in Music Composition),
  • Earth Dances (1986), orchestra
  • Harrison's Clocks (1998), piano
  • Gawain (1990), opera
  • Antiphonies (1992), piano and orchestra
  • The Second Mrs Kong (1994), opera
  • Panic (1995), alto saxophone, jazz drum kit and orchestra
  • The Last Supper (2000), opera

Popular perception of Birtwistle

Though well established and widely respected in the classical music world - modules on his music now feature in many University undergraduate music courses - Birtwistle was relatively unknown in the general public until the mid 1990s. Though he had been honoured with a knighthood in 1988, two events brought him to public attention.

A group of anti-modernist musicians calling themselves 'The Hecklers', led by Fredric Stocken, stunned the audience at the 1994 revivial of Gawain at the Royal Opera House, London. They disrupted the performance, drawing attention to their campaign to rid contemporary music of anything post-Romantic. If anything the event backfired on them, for it turned a relatively unimportant revival for the opera house into an event that many more people were keen to attend.

Birtwistle gained particular notoriety in 1995 when Panic was premièred at that year's Last Night of the Proms. His music had not previously been heard in so public a forum and most of the press did not hold back its negative criticism of the piece; traditionally the second half of the concert features mainstream, popular and patriotic music. Though the first half will often incorporate pieces that reflect the overall theme of each year's season, and modern works, such an uncompromising piece had not previously been programmed.

Reading

  • Adlington, R., The Music of Harrison Birtwistle (CUP, 2000)
  • Cross, J., Harrison Birtwistle: Man, Mind, Music (Faber & Faber, 2000)
  • Hall, M., Harrison Birtwistle (Robson Books, 1984)
  • Hall, M., Harrison Birtwistle in Recent Years (Robson Books, 1998)

External links

Categories: