Revision as of 14:56, 6 July 2011 editSchierbecker (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers57,127 edits →Alexa bot: recentism etc.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:19, 12 July 2011 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:OsamaK/July 2011. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | <!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | ||
== Alexa bot == | |||
Cool stuff! Sure beats me keeping a list of articles I need to frequently update. The {{increase}}/{{decrease}} indicators are currently used to indicate the traffic increase over a three month time period. Could you make the bot only change the indicators every three months like alexa.com does? ] ] 13:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks, Marcus. :) It seems that Alexa shows three different indicators for the last day, 7 days, month and three months. I thought one month is a good period to base increases and decreases on. Do you think it gives a statistical/analytical advantage to use three months period? (Please note that we are covering both large websites which rarely change as well as small websites which change every few hours!)--]]] 13:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
::I think it is best to appease those that dislike ]. The month-by-month inflation or recession of web traffic is subject to the obscure whims of Google's page rank algorithm. The decline or progress of a website cannot be measured on short-term gains or losses. The decline of this was apparent in a two-phased Google attack on ]s. The lulls in-between Google's attacks on crap could register as <nowiki>{{steady}}</nowiki> or worse <nowiki>{{increase}}</nowiki> based on the arbitrary day the bot happens to update the page despite the clear longterm downward trend. As a side note you could add a ~ instead of a "as of" template to demonstrate that the number is an out-of-date approximation. ] ] 14:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:19, 12 July 2011
Archives | ||
Index
| ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |