| Revision as of 23:20, 31 July 2011 editMikeWazowski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,732 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on The Soska Sisters. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:22, 31 July 2011 edit undo75.80.79.246 (talk) ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == July 2011 == | |||
| ] Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test on the page ] worked, and it has been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the ''']''' instead. Please take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-test1 --> ] (]) 23:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:SharedIPAdvice --> | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br> | |||
| In particular, the ] states that: | |||
| # '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you continue to edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:SharedIPAdvice --> | |||