| Revision as of 08:10, 10 August 2011 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,378,909 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:OsamaK/August 2011. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:39, 2 September 2011 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Alexa bot idea: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| <!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | <!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | ||
| == Alexa bot idea == | |||
| In the Internet industry, almost no one gives Alexa rankings credibility any more. Quantcast is the defacto standard in terms of publicly-available rankings. How hard would it be to have your bot take on the task of changing the articles it looks at over to Quantcast?--] (]) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 2 September 2011
 Archives | ||
Index
| ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Alexa bot idea
In the Internet industry, almost no one gives Alexa rankings credibility any more. Quantcast is the defacto standard in terms of publicly-available rankings. How hard would it be to have your bot take on the task of changing the articles it looks at over to Quantcast?--Jimbo Wales (talk) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)