Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:19, 20 August 2011 editAndering J. REDDSON (talk | contribs)428 edits →{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|Requests for clarification|Requests for clarification}}← Previous edit Revision as of 01:38, 20 August 2011 edit undoJeff G. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers116,567 edits →Request for mediation: “Non-Lethal Weap” page;: fixed the username links and made a statementNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


---- ----
== Request for mediation: ] page; == == Request for mediation: ] page; ==
'''Initiated by ''' A REDDSON '''at''' 01:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)19 August 2011 '''Initiated by ''' A REDDSON '''at''' 01:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)19 August 2011


''List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:'' ''List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:''
*{{Andering J. REDDSON|A J REDDSON}} (initiator) *{{userlinks|Andering J. REDDSON}} (initiator)
*{{Berean Hunter|⋙–Berean–Hunter—►}} *{{userlinks|Berean Hunter}}
*{{Binksternet|Binksternet}} *{{userlinks|Binksternet}}
*{{Marcus Qwertyus|Marcus Qwertyus}} *{{userlinks|Marcus Qwertyus}}


=== Statement by Andering J. REDDSON === === Statement by Andering J. REDDSON ===
I am requestion mediation on ] specifically against I am requestion mediation on ] specifically against
]. I have attempted to remove a source from the page; Specifically, that Amnesty ], yet is quoted as a “reputable source.” ] even said ''“Amnesty International is biased, of course, but they are a reliable source.”''<br /> ]. I have attempted to remove a source from the page; Specifically, that Amnesty ], yet is quoted as a “reputable source.” ] even said ''“Amnesty International is biased, of course, but they are a reliable source.”''<br />
Bear with me if I did this wrong, but I’m actually not sure how to do this. (For example I already know that my username links are broken, but I just can’t seem to figure out how to fix them.) Bear with me if I did this wrong, but I’m actually not sure how to do this. (For example I already know that my username links are broken, but I just can’t seem to figure out how to fix them.)

=== Statement ] ===
I have fixed the username links. Many organizations have biases in their interpretations of facts, both claimed and admitted, but most of those can still be trusted to report the facts correctly. &nbsp; — '''<span style="background:Yellow;color:Blue;">] ]</span>''' 01:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


=== Statement by other user === === Statement by other user ===

Revision as of 01:38, 20 August 2011

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests
Request name Motions  Case Posted
] none none 19 August 2011
] none none 20 August 2011
Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 10 January 2025

Requests for clarification

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification/Header

Request for clarification: WP:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names

Initiated by Fmph (talk) at 19:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:

Statement by Fmph

Can I direct ArbCom's attention to the first motion in this case. It states that "... no page moves shall be initiated for a period of 2 years" and that ruling is in force until September 18, 2011. Can ArbCom please clarify what they expect to happen on the 18th September?

There have been continued 'suggestions' over the last 23 months that the articles should be moved. So the issue has not gone away. I have made a suggestion (in response to a question as to whether the prohibition should be extended) as to what should happen. If ArbCom think its not a bad idea, perhaps they would like to endorse it, or something like it?

I will notify the project that I have opened this clarification.

Statement by other user

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrator views and discussion

Request for mediation: Non-lethal weapon page;

Initiated by A REDDSON at 01:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)19 August 2011

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:

Statement by Andering J. REDDSON

I am requestion mediation on “Non-Lethal Weap” specifically against ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►. I have attempted to remove a source from the page; Specifically, that Amnesty Amnesty International is considered biased by Misplaced Pages itself, yet is quoted as a “reputable source.” Binksternet even said “Amnesty International is biased, of course, but they are a reliable source.”
Bear with me if I did this wrong, but I’m actually not sure how to do this. (For example I already know that my username links are broken, but I just can’t seem to figure out how to fix them.)

Statement Jeff G.

I have fixed the username links. Many organizations have biases in their interpretations of facts, both claimed and admitted, but most of those can still be trusted to report the facts correctly.   — Jeff G.  ツ 01:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Statement by other user

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrator views and discussion