| Revision as of 13:42, 21 March 2006 editZandperl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,918 edits Omega← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:47, 21 March 2006 edit undoZandperl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,918 edits →OmegaNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I just hunted for 20 minutes and didn't find an article specifically on Omega, the density parameter. I put in a blurb about it on the ] page, and created two new redirect articles, ] and ]. I feel Omega deserves its own page, but I can't do it. --] 13:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | I just hunted for 20 minutes and didn't find an article specifically on Omega, the density parameter. I put in a blurb about it on the ] page, and created two new redirect articles, ] and ]. I feel Omega deserves its own page, but I can't do it. --] 13:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Or it could go under either ] or ]. --] 13:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:47, 21 March 2006
The author of this article says that the Friedmann equations relate certain cosmological parameters in the context of general relavity. I would like to modify this statement to say that these equations define certain cosmological models in general relativity, usually called the Friedmann dusts (or matter domninated Friedmann models) and Friedmann radiation fluids (or radiation dominated Friedmann models). The equations themselves arise in the course of deriving these models in a comoving coordinate chart.
Omega
I just hunted for 20 minutes and didn't find an article specifically on Omega, the density parameter. I put in a blurb about it on the Omega page, and created two new redirect articles, density of the universe and density parameter. I feel Omega deserves its own page, but I can't do it. --zandperl 13:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Or it could go under either Omega (cosmology) or Omega (astronomy). --zandperl 13:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)