Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mkativerata: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:08, 8 September 2011 editMkativerata (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,905 edits Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#RFC on the primary topic of China: re← Previous edit Revision as of 08:15, 8 September 2011 edit undoMkativerata (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,905 editsm Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#RFC on the primary topic of China: found itNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


Hi Mkativerata. In a discussion earlier this year, ], you proposed a triumvirate for closing contentious debates. Would you look at ] and ]? I mentioned the possibility of a triumvirate of admins to close ] which is related to the recently close RfC at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 02:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Hi Mkativerata. In a discussion earlier this year, ], you proposed a triumvirate for closing contentious debates. Would you look at ] and ]? I mentioned the possibility of a triumvirate of admins to close ] which is related to the recently close RfC at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 02:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
:This looks like a very good candidate for a triumvurate. But regrettably I'm almost certain I'm involved. I distinctly remember commenting in this debate (taking one side of it) a few months ago -- maybe not in the particular debate being closed but in a preliminary discussion. --] (]) 08:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC) :This looks like a very good candidate for a triumvurate. But regrettably I'm almost certain I'm involved. I commented in this debate (taking one side of it) a few months ago(). --] (]) 08:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:15, 8 September 2011

Note: If you post me a message here, I'll respond here, so please put my talk page on your watchlist if you are expecting a response. I don't leave talkback thingies. Likewise if I leave a note on your talk page, I will watchlist your talk page for any replies.

User Nmate being uncivil again

Hello! The purpose of this message is to notify you about the recent actions of User:Nmate. You blocked him a month ago for personal attacks, but unfortunately he insists in being uncivil. As it can be seen here he engaged in an edit war, bringing unfounded accusations of wiki-hounding and sock-puppetry as arguments of his reverts. He is trying to re-insert two sources that were confirmed by 3 uninvolved users (including a administrator) to be unreliable per WP:SPS (see more on the article talk page).

In the same time he is pressing for the elimination of a phrase supported by a (at least apparently) reliable scholar book (Istoria României. Transilvania, coord. Anton Drăgoescu, 1997 - where one of the authors is Prof. dr. Ioan BOLOVAN from the respected Babeș-Bolyai University)

This editor is not at the first deviation, as it can be seen in his block log. This warning, given after multiple attacks (including affirmations like "Iadrian yu is not an I.Q. champion") is also relevant.

He is helped in his demarches by User:Hobartimus

Please take some measures to calm him down. Thanks in advance (Daccono (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2011 (UTC))

Hi there, you really should take this to WP:AE rather than to an individual administrator, otherwise it can be said that you are "shopping" for an administrator likely to take action. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Raja Petra Kamarudin

great work. Decora (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

World Universities Debating Championship

You removed the results listing from this page can you confirm to Manticore that it should not be on the page as per Misplaced Pages rules. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DebateOne (talkcontribs) 22:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#RFC on the primary topic of China

Hi Mkativerata. In a discussion earlier this year, User talk:Mkativerata/Archive9#Triumvirate, you proposed a triumvirate for closing contentious debates. Would you look at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#RFC on the primary topic of China and User talk:Tabercil#Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive226#RFC on the primary topic of China? I mentioned the possibility of a triumvirate of admins to close Talk:China#Requested move August 2011 which is related to the recently close RfC at Talk:China#Primary topic of China. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

This looks like a very good candidate for a triumvurate. But regrettably I'm almost certain I'm involved. I commented in this debate (taking one side of it) a few months ago(). --Mkativerata (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)