| Revision as of 20:00, 22 March 2006 editJtkiefer (talk | contribs)9,299 edits archiving← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:53, 23 March 2006 edit undoSPUI (talk | contribs)75,418 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| You might want to read ] for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in ] contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --] ] 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | You might want to read ] for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in ] contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --] ] 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Curpsbot== | |||
| I didn't expect to be unbanned yet, so I emailed you. Would you be willing to certify an RFC "against" Curps relating to his block bot? Alternately, do you think there's any chance of an RFC about block bots in general not being deleted after a day for not being certified? --] (] - <small>]</small>) 08:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:53, 23 March 2006
Incident Report Board
Hi, I` m soory, but I had nothing to do with this; this is the first I even hear of it.Zmmz 03:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Acuman Is Very Underhanded
He instigates these problems then pretends he is innocent. I was never warned by anyone I was told that the beleived I made a personal attack and I verified what I did. Can you please look at the threat Acuman made toward me. How come nothing is done about his racist or untrue comments? Look at the large group of people complaining about his edits that are very misleading and misinforming 69.196.139.250 05:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
250
He's supposed to be blocked per this. As you can see for yourself, he's now moved to grossly vandalizing my talk page! Aucaman 06:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
RE
Could i ask my what's my personal attack? Inanna 23:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Since you're opposed to Curps's block bot
You might be interested in . --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 01:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Boothy arbcom case
original header ==Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443== --- changed so it wouldn't break talk page formatting
A final decision has been made in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.
For the Arbitration committee. ---Tony Sidaway 16:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Loyola vandal
You might want to read this report for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in Category:Wikipedia_vandals contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --Ryan Delaney 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Curpsbot
I didn't expect to be unbanned yet, so I emailed you. Would you be willing to certify an RFC "against" Curps relating to his block bot? Alternately, do you think there's any chance of an RFC about block bots in general not being deleted after a day for not being certified? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 08:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)