| Revision as of 21:59, 26 March 2006 editJim Tour (talk | contribs)103 edits Dropping adminship← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:49, 26 March 2006 edit undoJim Tour (talk | contribs)103 editsm →Dropping adminshipNext edit → | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| == Dropping adminship == | == Dropping adminship == | ||
| I do hope you are serious in your statement on the failed bcrat nomination page that you will also be resigning your adminship. Without animosity, I feel that would be best all around. For one thing, I can show it to JDG and hopefully use it to get him back to the project. For another thing, your history as Jtkiefer will follow you around like a wolf even if you have learned from all these misadventures. Better to chill out and come back later, compile a good record as a contributor, then see where you want to take it... Where will I be able to see you are in fact off the |
I do hope you are serious in your statement on the failed bcrat nomination page that you will also be resigning your adminship. Without animosity, I feel that would be best all around. For one thing, I can show it to JDG and hopefully use it to get him back to the project. For another thing, your history as Jtkiefer will follow you around like a wolf even if you have learned from all these misadventures. Better to chill out and come back later, compile a good record as a contributor, then see where you want to take it... Where will I be able to see you are in fact off the rolls of active admins? ] 21:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:49, 26 March 2006
Incident Report Board
Hi, I` m soory, but I had nothing to do with this; this is the first I even hear of it.Zmmz 03:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Acuman Is Very Underhanded
He instigates these problems then pretends he is innocent. I was never warned by anyone I was told that the beleived I made a personal attack and I verified what I did. Can you please look at the threat Acuman made toward me. How come nothing is done about his racist or untrue comments? Look at the large group of people complaining about his edits that are very misleading and misinforming 69.196.139.250 05:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
250
He's supposed to be blocked per this. As you can see for yourself, he's now moved to grossly vandalizing my talk page! Aucaman 06:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
RE
Could i ask my what's my personal attack? Inanna 23:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Since you're opposed to Curps's block bot
You might be interested in . --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 01:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Boothy arbcom case
original header ==Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443== --- changed so it wouldn't break talk page formatting
A final decision has been made in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.
For the Arbitration committee. ---Tony Sidaway 16:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Loyola vandal
You might want to read this report for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in Category:Wikipedia_vandals contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --Ryan Delaney 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Curpsbot
I didn't expect to be unbanned yet, so I emailed you. Would you be willing to certify an RFC "against" Curps relating to his block bot? Alternately, do you think there's any chance of an RFC about block bots in general not being deleted after a day for not being certified? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 08:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
WP:BRFA
Hi Jtkiefer. I notice you seem to be active on the Bots request for approval page, so I was wondering if you could take a look at my bot request and leave a comment on it. Thanks! Cmdrjameson 23:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Template:Archive
I modified the template. It now works on all archive pages on wikipedia. It will also work as if I never made an edit as it is backwards compatible. --Cool Cat 00:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Warning Template Subst
- Hey, I noticed that your bot has been substituting a bunch of my vanadlism warnings given to anon users. I was just wondering why you were doing this? I read the policy page but didn't quite understand why it's necessary. Thanks -- pm_shef 21:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Star Wars
Hey there. I noticed you created an incarnation of WPSW a couple months ago. Well, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Star Wars has been up for a month and a half now, so feel free to join and help out! — Deckiller 22:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
re: personal attacks
I phrased my opinion in the most civil manner I saw possible, and also linked to a couple of the edits that led me to that opinion. Had I said "oppose, candidate is a lunatic" (or "batshit"), I agree that it would have constituted a personal attack. — Mar. 26, '06 <freakofnurxture|talk>
Dropping adminship
I do hope you are serious in your statement on the failed bcrat nomination page that you will also be resigning your adminship. Without animosity, I feel that would be best all around. For one thing, I can show it to JDG and hopefully use it to get him back to the project. For another thing, your history as Jtkiefer will follow you around like a wolf even if you have learned from all these misadventures. Better to chill out and come back later, compile a good record as a contributor, then see where you want to take it... Where will I be able to see you are in fact off the rolls of active admins? Jim Tour 21:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)