Misplaced Pages

Muon-catalyzed fusion: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:41, 27 March 2006 editRock nj (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,832 edits See also← Previous edit Revision as of 17:14, 23 April 2006 edit undoJefffire (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,518 edits NPOV rewordingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Muon-catalyzed fusion''' is a process allowing ] to take place at ]. Although it can be produced reliably with the right equipment and has been much studied, it is believed that the poor energy balance will prevent it from ever becoming a practical power source. It used to be known as ]; however, this term is now avoided as it can create confusion with other reported forms of room-temperature fusion. '''Muon-catalyzed fusion''' is a process allowing ] to take place at ]. Although it can be produced reliably with the right equipment and has been much studied, it is believed that the poor energy balance will prevent it from ever becoming a practical power source. It used to be known as ]; however, this term is now avoided as it can create confusion with other suggested forms of room-temperature fusion.


In muon-catalyzed fusion, ] and ] nuclei form atoms with ]s, which are essentially heavy ]s. The muons orbit very close to the nuclei, shielding the positive charge of the nuclei and allowing them to move close enough to fuse. The muons survive the fusion reactions and remain available to ] further fusions. ] and F. C. Frank predicted this effect of muon-catalyzed fusion on theoretical grounds before ]. In muon-catalyzed fusion, ] and ] nuclei form atoms with ]s, which are essentially heavy ]s. The muons orbit very close to the nuclei, shielding the positive charge of the nuclei and allowing them to move close enough to fuse. The muons survive the fusion reactions and remain available to ] further fusions. ] and F. C. Frank predicted this effect of muon-catalyzed fusion on theoretical grounds before ].

Revision as of 17:14, 23 April 2006

Muon-catalyzed fusion is a process allowing nuclear fusion to take place at room temperature. Although it can be produced reliably with the right equipment and has been much studied, it is believed that the poor energy balance will prevent it from ever becoming a practical power source. It used to be known as cold fusion; however, this term is now avoided as it can create confusion with other suggested forms of room-temperature fusion.

In muon-catalyzed fusion, deuterium and tritium nuclei form atoms with muons, which are essentially heavy electrons. The muons orbit very close to the nuclei, shielding the positive charge of the nuclei and allowing them to move close enough to fuse. The muons survive the fusion reactions and remain available to catalyze further fusions. Andrei Sakharov and F. C. Frank predicted this effect of muon-catalyzed fusion on theoretical grounds before 1950.

One practical problem with the process is that muons are unstable, decaying in 2.2 microseconds while at rest. Hence there needs to be some cheap means of producing muons, and the muons must be arranged to catalyze as many reactions as possible before decaying. Another problem, recognized by J.D. Jackson in his seminal 1957 paper, is the approximately 1% probability of the muon "sticking" to the alpha particle (a helium-4 nucleus) that results from the deuterium-tritium fusion, removing it from the catalysis process. Even if muons were absolutely stable, each could catalyze, on average, only about 100 fusions before sticking—about one fifth the number needed to produce more energy than is consumed to produce the muons. Clearly, muon-catalyzed fusion is impractical without an efficient method of producing muons.


References

  • J.D. Jackson, "Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions between Hydrogen Isotopes by μ-Mesons," Physical Review, Vol. 106, No. 2, April 15, 1957.
  • Rafelski, Johann and Steven E. Jones (1987). "Cold Nuclear Fusion". Scientific American, v. 257 #1, pp. 84–89.

See also

Fusion power, processes and devices
Core topics
Nuclear fusion
Processes,
methods
Confinement
type
Gravitational
  • Alpha process
  • Triple-alpha process
  • CNO cycle
  • Fusor
  • Helium flash
  • Nova
  • Proton–proton chain
  • Carbon-burning
  • Lithium burning
  • Neon-burning
  • Oxygen-burning
  • Silicon-burning
  • R-process
  • S-process
  • Magnetic
    Magneto-inertial
    Inertial
    Electrostatic
    Other forms
    Devices,
    experiments
    Magnetic
    confinement
    Tokamak
    International
    Americas
    Asia,
    Oceania
    Europe
    Stellarator
    Americas
    Asia,
    Oceania
    Europe
    Pinch
    RFP
    Mirror
    Other
    Magneto-inertial
    Inertial
    confinement
    Laser
    Americas
    Asia
    Europe
    Non-laser
    Category: