Misplaced Pages

User talk:84.106.26.81: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:06, 7 November 2011 editMelbourneStar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers82,994 edits General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Cold fusion. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 14:57, 7 November 2011 edit undo84.106.26.81 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== November 2011 == == November 2011 ==
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article ], please cite a ] for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of ]. See ] for how to cite sources, and the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> -- ]<font color="#800080">☆</font>] <sup> ]</sup> 09:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC) ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article ], please cite a ] for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of ]. See ] for how to cite sources, and the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> -- ]<font color="#800080">☆</font>] <sup> ]</sup> 09:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
:Your message doesn't belong here at all. I have reverted you again
This is why:
:The cold fusion article describes a broad scope of low energy nuclear reactions. Historic use of the term should include the most recent change. Rossi for example doesn't consider his findings cold fusion but everyone else does. This is common knowledge to anyone who looked into the topic but the reader doesn't know this. His device also doesnt use paladium and requires just enough preheating to make the term "room temperature" dubious. Changing the article as a whole to reflect this is never going to be accepted just like that so we have to do it one step at a time. ] (]) 14:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:57, 7 November 2011

November 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cold fusion, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- MSTR 09:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your message doesn't belong here at all. I have reverted you again

This is why:

The cold fusion article describes a broad scope of low energy nuclear reactions. Historic use of the term should include the most recent change. Rossi for example doesn't consider his findings cold fusion but everyone else does. This is common knowledge to anyone who looked into the topic but the reader doesn't know this. His device also doesnt use paladium and requires just enough preheating to make the term "room temperature" dubious. Changing the article as a whole to reflect this is never going to be accepted just like that so we have to do it one step at a time. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)