Revision as of 19:50, 8 November 2011 editTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits checked← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:44, 13 November 2011 edit undoHelloAnnyong (talk | contribs)Administrators42,958 edits Marking case as closedNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} | ||
=====<big>08 November 2011</big>===== | =====<big>08 November 2011</big>===== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
The two named accounts, plus P&W are all {{unlikely}} to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts ''tagged'' as P&W, but I'm can't see why. <font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC) | The two named accounts, plus P&W are all {{unlikely}} to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts ''tagged'' as P&W, but I'm can't see why. <font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
*The CU result here makes me think this is meatpuppetry. Closing with no action taken for now. — ] <sup>]</sup> 14:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 14:44, 13 November 2011
Phoenix and Winslow
Phoenix and Winslow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix and Winslow/Archive.
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
08 November 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Cowboysforever (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Liangshan Yi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Two more single-edit accounts whose only contribution has been to back P&W up in his/her attempts to disrupt the talk page at Ugg boots. This fits the modus operandi of confirmed sock puppets such as Bigdog2828 and Barclaygla09. Daveosaurus (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two named accounts, plus P&W are all Unlikely to be related to each other. Looking back (and correct me if I'm wrong), it was never established that P&W had any alternate accounts. There were some "possible" matches, but nothing concrete. There are accounts tagged as P&W, but I'm can't see why. TNXMan 19:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- The CU result here makes me think this is meatpuppetry. Closing with no action taken for now. — HelloAnnyong 14:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories: