Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:22, 15 November 2011

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

Pantelimon

Salut, am vazut ca ai contribuit la articolul despre cartierul Pantelimon din Bucuresti (Pantelimon, Bucharest). Exista pe aceasta pagina o referinta la o poveste care se numeste "The Children's Fall" si despre care nu gasesc nimic altceva nicaieri pe Internet, ai idee despre ce este vorba si daca nu, se poate afla cine a scris despre povestea respectiva pe pagina de wikipedia?(nu ma pricep asa bine).

cutkiller

Banat

Please check the article on Banat. Is it posible to take this wiki in the Romanian Project?

Slim Helu

Discuss Carlos Slim on the talk page.

Blocare

Salut

Sunt User:Iaaasi blocat de tine la recomandarea lui User:Dahn si as vrea sa expun cateva idei in legatura cu sanctionarea mea.

Procesul de blocare s-a realizat ocolind procedurile clasice (WP:AIV, WP:SPI), iar totul s-a derulat rapid, fiindu-mi astfel rapita ocazia de a ma apara, drept care care as dori sa explic aici cateva aspecte. Probabil datorita reputatiei ridicate a acuzatorului am fost pedepsit fara prea multe verificari.

In primul rand incriminarea ca as User:Bonaparte (user blocat inca din 2007) mi se gratuita, intrucat, dupa cum mi-a confirmat AdiJapan, fiind vorba de contribuții foarte vechi, IP-urile lui Bonaparte nu mai sînt accesibile prin checkuser si in consecinta singurele dovezi ar fi putut fi eventuale similaritati de compartament. Andrei Stroe mi-a comunicat: Personal, nu cred că sunteţi User:Bonaparte;reafirmaţi că nu sunteţi o clonă a lui User:Bonaparte (pot să aduc şi eu argumente pentru asta).

Din cate am observat, Bonaparte a avut o conduita (ultra)nationalista si s-a concentrat in special pe teme legate de Transnistria si Rep Moldova. Eu m-am ocupat, printre altele, de "Romanian-Hungarian affairs".

In al II-lea rand recunosc ca am facut erori, dar cred ca am circumstante atenuante si imi pare rau ca sunt acuzat ca am fost de rea credinta. Imi dau seama ca am gresit grav cand mi-am pierdut cumpatul si am creat, ca act de razbunare pentru atitutdinile dupa parerea mea incorecte ale unor editori de pe WikiProject Hungary, un profil ce poate fi etichetat drept xenofobic. Este singura gafa cu adevarat majora, si o regret.

Acuzatiile lui Dahn (edits to weed out all references to dual citizenship for some Romanians and Hungarians, various forms of xenophobic edit warring, all sorts of inflammatory rants on talk pages) sunt din pacate incorecte, eu am incercat doar sa contracarez excesele anumitor useri maghiari, nu sa impun un punct de vedere ultra-nationalist.

Scurta mea activitate pe WP a fost marcata un sir de "conflicte" (pe care le pot prezenta in amanunt daca este nevoie), purtate de mine singur contragrupului de useri maghiari (Nmate, Squash Racket, Baxter9, Hobartimus, Rokarudi), dispute din care inevitabil am iesit pierzator in majoritatea cazurilor, desi dreptatea era de multe ori de partea mea. Cand intr-un final Squash Racket a incercat sa stearga numele romanesc "Gheorghe Doja" de pe articolul despre Gyorgy Dozsa si nu a putut fi convins ca procedeaza gresit, pur si simplu am cedat, si am redactat, in semn de razbunare, o pagina profil ce poate fi etichetata drept anti-maghiara (pe care am sters-o dupa o zi sau doua si care oricum nu era in acord cu parerile mele despre unguri in general)

Ulterior mi-am creat un nou cont, User:Umumu, care a fost blocat pentru sokpuppetry. Deschiderea contului clandestin nu a fost un mobil pentru a perpetua distrugeri, ci o modalitate de a continua realizarea de contributii constructive dupa o pedeapsa pe care am socotit-o nedreapta.

Sper ca o sa se rezolve situatia intr-un mod fericit si o sa primesc o a doua sansa. Te rog mult sa-mi dai un raspuns, oricat de scurt, macar cat sa stiu ca ai parcurs acest mesaj.

Proposed deletion of 100 greatest Romanians

The article 100 greatest Romanians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/200 Greatest Israelis. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 100 greatest Romanians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100 greatest Romanians is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/100 greatest Romanians (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Adding to the nom's above notice, I should point out that I quoted you at the indicated AfD. Especially in the event that your view may have changed, you may wish to see what my quote reflected. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Bogdangiusca! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

To the bee, the best at satisfying Dahn's sexual needs

I wa wondering (or, after a while, me and Biruitorul were wondering) if you would be interested in helping us accomplish something that, for me in any case, is uncharacteristically patriotic: an all-Romanian, all-WWI, Did You Know queue on December 1. We've got two articles set aside already, I for one have got some more in the making, and the more the better: maybe we end up with two queues... but I'm getting ahead of myself here. Anyway, it would be great to have you in as the third contributor, provided you want, have the time to, and are inspired by the topic. I guess this is sort of an open invitation, "should you want to accept it". Dahn (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

I like the idea, so count me in. I'm thinking of writing an article about Romania during the Central Powers occupation and maybe I can find some other topic. :) bogdan (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I was thinking of that as well, but my concern is that it would be redundant to the existing Romania in World War I. I mean, between that and the treaties (two in Bucharest, one in Brest, one in Paris...), the events (battle upon battle, union of... with..., war of... with...), the concepts (Greater Romania, Old Kingdom, National Council of..., Directory Council of..., Rumcherod), we'd be having a plethora of articles on the same short time span: 1917-1919. I don't want to suggest that we couldn't do it in the way you suggest, but maybe it is more manageable if we center it on (and this is sizzling stuff) the Romanian administration of occupied Romania. Administration of occupied Romania (1917–1918), Government of occupied Romania (1917–1918) or similar would be, I believe, more focused, and could in any case be saying a lot about what the occupiers themselves were doing; plus it's a place to link all the parallel references to "Minister of..." in articles such as Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcaş. It could also tackle the fact that toward the end even legitimate Romania recognized the administration - it had to, I guess, but it's just one of those gems... In my view, it could fill the big hole at the middle of Romania in World War I without creating the redundant overlap.

But whatever you chose of the two is fine, and I'll be there to consolidate. As per our good old tradition :). Dahn (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Where would cultural aspects fit in? This is an essay focusing on Romanian culture during the war, both before 1916, during the occupation and under the Iasi government. Unfortunately, we can't see all of it, and I'm not sure where else we could find material on the subject (the author says it's largely neglected), but there's a Polish culture during World War II, so maybe. - Biruitorul 14:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Oh, believe me, there are sources, to count just my usual suspects (Cernat, Călinescu, Boia, Vianu Sr., Vianu Jr., Crohmălniceanu, Gârbea, Cioculescu, Cioroianu, Tismăneanu, Veiga, Pârvulescu, Stanomir, Ornea, Babeţi & Ungureanu, Neumann all tackle the subject in various ways); I also have worthy prefaces to Rebreanu, Fundoianu, Vinea, Topîrceanu, Cezar Petrescu, and Ilincioiu's study to Doctrina ţărănistă. That's the literary, social and philosophical side mainly. But then we have the visual arts stuff, where I can mainly rely on Grigorescu, but I also have some monographs on some of the main names to remember (Verona, Tonitza) and we can easily get more on some of the others who add to the chorus (say, Paciurea or this guy). Nothing I have can replace Maria Bucur as the source on popular culture, alas - except perhaps a pinch of Boia here and there, and, provided we can leaf through and get the relevant bit, something in the precious Neubauer-Cornis series.

The issue with synthetic articles is not about writing them, it's about finishing them and then spraying the links around in all relevant articles. It's of the Symbolist movement category, if we do it right; if not... I mean, Polish culture during World War II has improved a lot (the article, I mean, not the subject!), but it still looks like trivia has been thrown in there. Dahn (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

At which point I realize I haven't replied to your most stringent question: whether or not we end up creating a separate article, I find that the basic overview on culture belongs most likely at the end of Romania in World War I - which is now so militarily-focused that it is illegible.

A note of my own, for when/if we get a look into this: we are likely to find ourselves ignoring this aspect, but note how the period has had an indirect impact on Romanian cinema, from Ciulei (may God rest our Orson Welles) to this (the lady' right - it's quite good) and, obviously, this (the epilogue, I mean). Dahn (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Btw, Bogdan, can you help me with this? I seem to have botched up the vectorizing (again!), and there's plenty of gaps in my understanding of how it works: for instance, why the font I chose, which was closer to the model, never made it on the commons copy. If you want to redo it from scratch and upload over it, I wouldn't mind the least; in fact, you'd be helping me hide my shame :). Dahn (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Btw, gentlemen, could I point out that DYK is also for 5X expanded articles? There are some categories of potential adoptees... Dahn (talk) 10:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Bogdan, take note: Dahn is interested in you. So will you guys be dating? Have you tried dating women or girls? 76.208.166.194 (talk) 04:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

BTW, Dahn I'm sure you'd find women out there if you got off the internet more often. Just smooth talk them... 76.208.166.194 (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Paleo-Balkan Languages

Hi!

I stumbled upon the article on paleo-balkan languages which you started a long time ago. While your intention seems to have been good, it has somehow gone out of hand by now. I started a discussion and wanted you to know if you like to have a word in the discussion.Amilah (talk) 20:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

The term is used by linguistics not as a subgroup of the IE languages, but rather as a geographical grouping of the languages, which, with the exception of Greek, we know very little other than the fact they were IE. The article doesn't say anywhere that they were in fact a family. There are some sources about the topic, so it's possible to add more references. bogdan (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)