| Revision as of 22:56, 30 March 2006 editJ is me (talk | contribs)29 edits Bye← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:10, 31 March 2006 edit undoCollins1921 (talk | contribs)3 edits →ByeNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| P.s. I am also NSWelshman but noone will even notice a change in this page until many days have passed by and it is too late to act. This will prove the unstable mental state of those who tried to attack me. Shhhh to passive observers, leave it be --] 22:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | P.s. I am also NSWelshman but noone will even notice a change in this page until many days have passed by and it is too late to act. This will prove the unstable mental state of those who tried to attack me. Shhhh to passive observers, leave it be --] 22:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::You are not me and I resent the implication. If you wish to continue to troll Licinius than d not do it in a way that reflects on me. ] | |||
Revision as of 13:10, 31 March 2006
I warned you against voting in any polls. Removing a "suspected sockpuppet" template from your own user page is vandalism. If you put one on my user page I can't remove it either. Of course, you would need evidence that I am using sockpuppets, or you would be committing another kind of vandalism. Grant65 | Talk 04:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Blanking
Do not blank other peoples talk pages here. It's considered vandalism. THanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for disingenuous and disruptive accusations of sockpuppetry against innocent users. Snottygobble 09:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You and your IP 60.225.217.77 have been blocked for one week for circumventing the previous block by logging in anonymously, for continuing to remove sockpuppet messages from your user page, and continuing to make false and deliberately disruptive accusations of sockpuppetry against innocent users. Snottygobble 05:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You and your IP 60.225.218.137 have been blocked for one month for continuing to remove sockpuppet messages from your user page, after many many warnings not to continue doing so. Snottygobble 05:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
Unfortunately I could only block your IP 62.254.168.102 for 24 hours, as I suspect it may be shared with some good faith editors. However, since you persist in bypassing blocks by logging in anonymously, and since you persist in bad faith accusations of sockpuppetry, and since you persist in removing the good-faith sockpuppet message from your user page, this account has now been blocked indefinitely. Snottygobble 11:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
To myself
I need to show sonttygobble up for the unwikipedian administrator he is, hahahahahaha, and thankyou to those that may or may not have changed my page. 04:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)J is me
Snottygobble
As far as I can see Snottygobble, you are an unwikipedian administrator. This hardly amounts to personal abuse as far as I can see. If you abuse your privellidge, than I fail to see how you can cry foul for being called that. --The man from OZ 11:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Bye
Though I admit that to be wrongfully banned annoyed me considerably, I have had my fun in return over the past couple of days, and besides, the administrators own this in a way, so if they want to ban, who am I to complain? It has been amusing to see the feckless Snottygobble try to claim that he has been attacked, and that I personally threatened him with the comment I made two posts up. Well he is unwikipedian compared to many of the guidelines I have read. Anyway, if the administrators see fit to keep him than so be it. So I will stop using sockpuppets (yes I used them to post comments on Snottygobble's page and the rhyming slang man's page) and get on with the things I am doing. Too ra loo
P.s. I am also NSWelshman but noone will even notice a change in this page until many days have passed by and it is too late to act. This will prove the unstable mental state of those who tried to attack me. Shhhh to passive observers, leave it be --J is me 22:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- You are not me and I resent the implication. If you wish to continue to troll Licinius than d not do it in a way that reflects on me. NSWelshman