Misplaced Pages

User talk:GraemeL: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:02, 9 December 2011 editGraemeL (talk | contribs)35,298 edits Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 17:03, 9 December 2011 edit undoGraemeL (talk | contribs)35,298 editsm →hey there: capsNext edit →
Line 44: Line 44:


it is actually mentioned in the same article, that the occurrence is 10-30%. I have started to notice similar patterns in many wiki pages; different information within the same article. So, do you want me to cite the wikipedia article itself for the information (which wasnt cited before)? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> it is actually mentioned in the same article, that the occurrence is 10-30%. I have started to notice similar patterns in many wiki pages; different information within the same article. So, do you want me to cite the wikipedia article itself for the information (which wasnt cited before)? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Ugh. That sort of thing happens when vandalism gets missed. I'll check it out and change it back, then remove the warning from your talk page. If you fill out the edit summary box, it makes it less likely that you'll be reverted. thanks for pointing it out to me. --] ] 16:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC) :Ugh. That sort of thing happens when vandalism gets missed. I'll check it out and change it back, then remove the warning from your talk page. If you fill out the edit summary box, it makes it less likely that you'll be reverted. Thanks for pointing it out to me. --] ] 16:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:03, 9 December 2011

There is no Cabal

.

  • I will reply here unless you ask me to reply somewhere else.
  • If I posted something (other than a warning) to your talk page, I probably added it to my watch list. I would prefer replies in the same page as the original post. However, feel free to reply here if you want.
  • If I missed an update on your talk page, please poke me with {{Talkback|your username}} on this page.


I am: OUT

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17

The Signpost
24 December 2024

hey there

it is actually mentioned in the same article, that the occurrence is 10-30%. I have started to notice similar patterns in many wiki pages; different information within the same article. So, do you want me to cite the wikipedia article itself for the information (which wasnt cited before)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.38.23.41 (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Ugh. That sort of thing happens when vandalism gets missed. I'll check it out and change it back, then remove the warning from your talk page. If you fill out the edit summary box, it makes it less likely that you'll be reverted. Thanks for pointing it out to me. --GraemeL 16:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)