Revision as of 03:00, 17 December 2011 editDismas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers79,891 edits sign← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:11, 17 December 2011 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,590,587 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-3RR}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.Next edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
] Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
{{uw-3RR}} <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>|] 03:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-family:monospace;">]</span>|] 03:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:11, 17 December 2011
December 2011
I don't know what the background behind the battle between you and Illyukhina, but I do see that virtually all of your editing has been edit warring on articles where Illyukhina has done likewise. I also see that you have never made any attempt to explain what you are doing. This is not how Misplaced Pages works: if you find that another editor disagrees with your editing, then please discuss the issue, and try to reach agreement. If you continue in this way you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sasha (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
December 16, 2011
Well, I am not involved in the editing war. What I am doing is just reverting all articles edited by User Illyukhina Illyukhina talk contribs to original text. User Illyukhina Illyukhina shows consistent vandalism in mass editing of Biographies of living persons on Misplaced Pages without providing an edit summary or any reasonable explanation. User Illyukhina Illyukhina in not willing to discuss anything, please check the history of User Illyukhina talk, all the warnings and conversations are deleted by Illyukhina. Petrukhina (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- this is called an edit war. There are many other things to do here on Misplaced Pages, please leave reverting her edits to other editors with more experience. Sasha (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dismas| 03:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)